Anderson v. McKelroy et al

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/3/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 No. C 15-2013 MEJ (PR) TUANJA EDWARD ANDERSON, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Plaintiff, v. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Docket No. 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 11 CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON, 12 Defendants. 13 / 14 On May 5, 2014, plaintiff, an inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), filed 15 this pro se action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et 16 seq. (“ADA”). On December 9, 2015, the Court reviewed plaintiff’s amended complaint and 17 found that, liberally construed, it stated an ADA claim. Plaintiff correctly named as 18 defendants SVSP and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 19 (“CDCR”). See Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999, 1005 n.8 (8th Cir. 1999) 20 (“[The ADA] provides disabled individuals redress for discrimination by a ‘public entity.’ 21 See 42 U.S.C. § 12132. That term, as it is defined within the statute, does not include 22 individuals. See 42 U.S.C. § 12131(1).”). 23 In its December 9, 2015 order, the Court directed service on Jeffrey Beard and 24 William Muniz, in their capacities as representatives of, respectively, the CDCR and SVSP. 25 The CDCR and SVSP have appeared in this action and point out that Jeffrey Beard and 26 William Muniz were not named in plaintiff’s amended complaint. They request modification 27 of the December 9, 2015 order to show that the CDCR and SVSP are the only defendants. 28 Defendants are correct that the Court erroneously named Mr. Beard and Mr. Muniz as 1 defendants. Accordingly, the December 9, 2015 order is now amended to delete lines 16 2 through 17 on page 3 and replace them with the following text: – California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation – Salinas Valley State Prison 3 4 The Clerk shall terminate Jeffrey Beard and William Muniz as defendants on the 5 Court’s docket in this action. Defendants’ request to reissue summons is denied as 6 unnecessary given that the CDCR and SVSP have been served via their agents and have 7 appeared through counsel. 8 The schedule for filing of dispositive motions set forth in the December 9, 2015 order 9 remains in place. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 This order terminates Docket No. 14. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 DATED: February 3, 2016 Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?