Fontes v. Autocom Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/15/2015. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015)

Download PDF
1 4 BROOKE OLIVER, ESQ. (SBN 172828) brooke@50balmy.com 50 Balmy Law P.C. 50 Balmy Alley San Francisco, CA 94110 Phone: 415-641-1116 Fax: 415-695-1116 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL FONTES 6 AARON H. JACOBY, ESQ. (SBN 137244) aaron.jacoby@arentfox.com VICTOR P. DANHI, ESQ. (SBN 210246) victor.danhi@arentfox.com ARENT FOX LLP 55 Second Street, 21st Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-757-5500 Fax: 415-757-5501 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendants AUTOCOM NETWORKS, INC., AUTOCOM POWER, LLC, JOSE PEREZ, and NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. 13 [See next page for additional attorneys] 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 DANIEL FONTES, an individual 18 Case No. C 15-2044 CRB Assigned for all Purposes to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer, Courtroom 6 Plaintiff, 19 vs. 20 AUTOCOM NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation; AUTOCOM POWER, LLC, a California limited liability company d/b/a AUTOCOM NISSAN OF OAKLAND; M&M AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., a California corporation d/b/a Volkswagen of Oakland; MICHAEL P. MURPHY, an individual formerly d/b/a NISSAN OF OAKLAND; NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California corporation; JOSE PEREZ, an individual a/k/a JOSE CARMEN PEREZ GARCIA; TDK TRUST DATED JANUARY 23, 1995, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL [CASE NO. C15-2044 CRB] 1 Additional attorneys: 2 WILLIAM J. MURRAY, ESQ. (SBN 87936) Belzer & Murray LLP 3650 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Suite 130 Lafayette, CA 94549 Murray@wjmattorneys.com Phone: (925) 284-9000 Fax: (925) 283-5192 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendants MICHAEL P. MURPHY and M&M AUTOMOTIVE DOUGLAS A. MARSHALL, ESQ. (SBN 91277) Kay & Merkle, LLP 100 The Embarcadero, Penthouse San Francisco, CA 94105 dmarshall@kmlaw100.com Phone: 415-357-1200 Fax: 415-512-9277 Attorneys for Defendant TDK TRUST 13 STIPULATION 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff DANIEL FONTES, an individual, by and through his attorneys of record, hereby files this Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice and stipulates as follows: 1. The parties have entered into a confidential Settlement Agreement in this matter 19 whereby they have resolved all claims in this action and have agreed to the dismissal of the entire 20 above-captioned action with prejudice. Each party has agreed to bear and waive their own 21 attorneys’ fees and costs. 22 23 2. Accordingly, the parties jointly request the Court to dismiss this action in its entirety with prejudice. 24 25 Dated: December 10, 2015 26 50 BALMY LAW, P.C. By: /s/ Brooke Oliver Brooke Oliver Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL FONTES 27 28 -2CASE NO. C15-2044 CRB STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 1 Dated: December 10, 2015 2 ARENT FOX LLP By: /s/ Victor P. Danhi Victor P. Danhi Attorneys for Defendants AUTOCOM NETWORKS, INC., AUTOCOM POWER, LLC, JOSE PEREZ, and NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: December 10, 2015 8 By: /s/ William J. Murray William J. Murray Attorneys for Defendants MICHAEL P. MURPHY and M&M AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. 9 10 11 BELZER & MURRAY LLP Dated: December 10, 2015 KAY & MERKLE, LLP 12 By: /s/ Douglas A. Marshall Douglas A. Marshall Attorneys for Defendant TDK TRUST 13 14 15 16 [PROPOSED] ORDER 17 18 Having considered the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice and for good 19 cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED: The above-entitled action is dismissed in its entirety 20 with prejudice, with each party to bear and waive their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 15th Dated: December __, 2015 24 __________________________________________ THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 -3CASE NO. C15-2044 CRB STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?