Trejo -v- Simmons Manufacturing Co

Filing 40

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 39 Stipulation RE DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

JOSEPH TREJO, on behalf of
himself, all others similarly situated,
and the general public,

13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,
vs.
THE SIMMONS
MANUFACTURING CO., LLC, a
Delaware limited liability
corporation; and DOES 1-50,
inclusive,

Case No.: 15-CV-02058-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Action Filed: March 23, 2015

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
348486
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

ORDER

1
2
3

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

4
5

Having considered the Joint Stipulation between counsel for Plaintiff

6

JOSEPH TREJO (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant THE SIMMONS

7

MANUFACTURING CO., LLC, and good cause appearing therefore, this Court

8

hereby ORDERS that the Answer to Plaintiff’s Class Action Complaint

9

(“Answer”) previously filed by former defendant Defendant Simmons Bedding

10

Company, LLC (see Dkt. No. 1, Exh. G), shall be deemed the Answer of

11

substituted defendant The Simmons Manufacturing Co., LLC to Plaintiff’s Second

12

Amended Complaint, notwithstanding any references therein to “Simmons

13

Bedding Company, LLC.” All references in the Answer to “Defendant” and/or

14

“Simmons Bedding Company, LLC” shall be deemed to mean and refer to

15

substituted defendant The Simmons Manufacturing Co., LLC.

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19
20

Dated: _____________, 2016
April 27

By: _______________________________
HONORABLE HAYWOOD S.
GILLIAM, JR.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
348486

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT