Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. et al

Filing 410

ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2024)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
BUREAU,
Plaintiff,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

Case No. 15-cv-02106-RS
ORDER RE FURTHER BRIEFING

v.
NATIONWIDE BIWEEKLY
ADMINISTRATION, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

Within one week of the date of this order, defendants shall file a statement indicating

17

whether or not they are withdrawing their contentions, presented in Docket No. 397, that the prior

18

judgment in this action should be vacated based on the alleged unconstitutionality of Consumer

19

Financial Protection Bureau’s funding mechanism. In the event defendants intend to pursue those

20

contentions, their statement may include up to 8 pages of argument addressing the import of the

21

Supreme Court’s ruling in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial

22

Services Association Of America, Ltd., No. 22–448, issued today. If defendants do not withdraw

23

their arguments that the funding mechanism is unconstitutional, plaintiff may file a responsive

24

brief, not to exceed 8 pages, within a week thereafter.

25

Defendants’ motion for an order directing the release of certain funds, which was not set

26

for hearing, is appropriate for disposition without oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-

27

1(b), and will be decided in due course.

28

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4
5

Dated: May 16, 2024
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
Chief United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CASE NO.

2

15-cv-02106-RS