Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. et al

Filing 64

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 59 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney; granting 63 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Plaintiff, United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 Case No. 15-cv-02106-RS v. NATIONWIDE BIWEEKLY ADMINISTRATION, INC., et al., ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND EXTENDING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. 15 16 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) the unopposed motion of Glenn V. Whitaker, Eric W. 17 Richardson and Nathan L. Colvin, of Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease, LLP to withdraw as 18 counsel for Defendants Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc., Loan Payment Administration, 19 LLC, and Daniel S. Lipsky is suitable for disposition without oral argument and the hearing set for 20 February 4, 2016 is vacated. Good cause appearing, the motion is granted. Defendants shall 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 continue to be represented in this action by Sean E. Ponist of the Law Office of Sean Ponist, P.C., and Allyson Baker of Venable, LLP. Defendants’ unopposed motion to extend the briefing schedule on plaintiff’s motion to strike affirmative defenses is granted. Opposition shall be due on January, 21, 2016, and any reply must be filed by January 28, 2016. The hearing is hereby continued to February 11, 2016. In the event that motion is taken under submission without oral argument, further notice will be given vacating the hearing. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 Dated: January 11, 2016 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2 15-cv-02106-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?