Klamut v. King City

Filing 81

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 3/20/2017. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/17/2017. (mejlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILLIAM KLAMUT, 8 Plaintiff, 9 NIBECKER, et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 10 Case No. 15-cv-02132-MEJ Defendants. 12 13 The Court’s September 16, 2016 Amended Case Management Order required the parties to 14 file their pretrial conference statement, motions in limine, and trial briefs by March 16, 2017. Dkt. 15 No. 50. Plaintiff William Klamut did not file his trial brief, motions in limine, or proposed jury 16 instructions. By failing to meet the deadline, Plaintiff has waived his right to submit any motions 17 in limine or proposed jury instructions. In addition, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause 18 as to why it should not sanction Plaintiff for failing to obey the Amended Case Management Order 19 by not filing his trial brief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f)(1)(C) (“On motion or on its own, the court 20 may issue any just orders . . . if a party or its attorney . . . fails to obey a scheduling or other 21 pretrial order.”). Plaintiff shall file his response by March 20, 2017. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 17, 2017 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?