Rombauer Family Partnership II, L.P. et al v. Jam Cellars, Inc. et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/18/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

DANIEL A. REIDY, ESQ. (SBN 139321)
REIDY LAW GROUP
1230 Spring Street
St. Helena, CA 94574
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

RICHARD J. IDELL, ESQ. (SBN 069033)
ORY SANDEL, ESQ. (SBN 233204)
THE IDELL FIRM
465 California Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Rombauer Family
Partnership II, L.P., a California limited
partnership, and Rombauer Vineyards, Inc., a
California corporation
ANDREW P. HOLLAND, ESQ. (SBN 224737)
THOITS LAW
400 Main Street, Suite 250
Los Altos, CA 94022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant Lloyd Cellars, Inc., a
California corporation

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20
21
22

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ROMBAUER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
II, L.P., a California limited partnership;
ROMBAUER VINEYARDS, INC., a
California corporation,

25
26
27

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE

Plaintiffs,

23
24

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02182-RS

v.
JAM CELLARS, Inc., a California
corporation; LLOYD CELLARS, INC., a
California corporation; and DOES 1 through
100.
Defendants.

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

1

1
2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Rombauer Family Partnership II, L.P.
and Rombauer Vineyards, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Lloyd Cellars, Inc., (“Defendant

3
4

Lloyd Cellars”), through their designated counsel that:

5

1.

6

resolves the disputes between the parties and provides that this court will retain jurisdiction over

7
8

Plaintiffs and Defendant Lloyd Cellars have entered into a Settlement Agreement that

the parties to this stipulation in the event of a dispute arising out of or relating to Section 2.0 or
5.0 of the Settlement Agreement.

9
10

2.

The Honorable Richard Seeborg of this Court, and in the event of his unavailability, a

11

judge appointed by the Chief Judge, retains continuing jurisdiction over the parties for the sole

12

purpose of resolving and adjudicating all disputes arising out of or relating to any provision of

13

Section 2.0 and 5.0 in the Settlement Agreement.

14

3.

The above referenced terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement may be enforced

15
16

in the future through proceedings filed directly with this Court before Judge Seeborg, or in the

17

event of his unavailability, a judge appointed pursuant to paragraph 2 above.

18

4.

19

Subject to the above provisions, and pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, the present action is dismissed without prejudice.

20

REIDY LAW GROUP
THE IDELL FIRM

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Dated: February 25, 2016

By:
/s/
Daniel A. Reidy
Richard J. Idell
Ory Sandel
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Rombauer Family
Partnership II, L.P. and Rombauer Vineyards, Inc.

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

2

1
2

THOITS LAW
Dated: February 24, 2016

By:

/s/Andrew P. Holland
Andrew P. Holland
Attorneys for Defendant Lloyd Cellars, Inc.

By:

________________________
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED:
March 18,
Dated: February __, 2016

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

3