McEnroe v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC

Filing 78

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 77 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT LIMITED TO ISSUES STEMMING FROM CERTAIN DISCOVERY REQUESTS CONCERNING PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGED DAMAGES. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2016)

1 Lisa C. Hamasaki (SBN 197628)
[e-mail]
2 Shannon R. Clawson (SBN 273699)
[e-mail]
3 MILLER LAW GROUP
A Professional Corporation
4 111 Sutter Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94104
5 Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
6
Attorneys for Defendant
7 AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC
8

NEUMANN LAW

3558 ROUND BARN BLVD., SUITE 200
SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95403
[phone]

9
10

MICHELLE DYE NEUMANN (STATE BAR #303601)

GEARINGER LAW GROUP

11

740 FOURTH STREET
SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95404
[phone]

M ILLER L AW G ROUP

A P RO F E SSIO NAL C O RPO RATIO N
C ALIF O RNIA

12

13 BRIAN GEARINGER (STATE BAR #146125)
14 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF SARA MCENROE
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18

SARA McENROE,

19

Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK)

Plaintiff,

AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC, and DOES
22 1 through 20, inclusive,

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE
FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT LIMITED TO ISSUES
STEMMING FROM CERTAIN DISCOVERY
REQUESTS CONCERNING PLAINTIFF’S
ALLEGED DAMAGES

23

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam

20 v.
21

24

Defendants.
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, California 94102

25

Complaint filed: April 14, 2015
Trial Date: January 23, 2017

26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST
Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK)

1

Plaintiff SARA MCENROE and Defendant AT&T Mobility Services LLC

2 (“Defendant” or “AT&T”) (collectively, “the Parties”), through their counsel of record, filed a
3 stipulation and request for extension of the fact discovery deadline for Defendant, which
4 would be limited to issues stemming from certain discovery requests concerning Plaintiff’s
5 alleged damages set forth in Defendant’s Requests for Production, Set Two and
6 Interrogatories, Set Two.
7
8

After full consideration of the stipulation and request submitted by the parties,

9 the supporting declaration, and all other matters presented to this Court, and good cause
10 appearing therefore, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties’ stipulation and request is
11 hereby GRANTED to allow time for Defendant to conduct discovery limited to issues that

M ILLER L AW G ROUP

A P RO F E SSIO NAL C O RPO RATIO N
C ALIF O RNIA

12 stem from Plaintiff’s responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production, Set Two, and
13 Interrogatories, Set Two, including depositions and written discovery, which the Parties
14 understand shall be discovery related to Plaintiff’s alleged damages for emotional distress
15 and alleged compensatory damages and mitigation efforts. The Court HEREBY ORDERS
16 THAT:
17
18



19
20

Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant’s Requests for Production, Set Two,
and Interrogatories, Set Two, on or by July 1, 2016;



The fact discovery cut-off to conduct discovery on issues that stem from

21

Plaintiff’s responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production, Set Two,

22

and Interrogatories, Set Two, including depositions and written

23

discovery, which the Parties understand shall be discovery related to

24

Plaintiff’s alleged damages for emotional distress and alleged

25

compensatory damages and mitigation efforts (e.g., depositions of

26

Plaintiff’s health care providers and records from Plaintiff’s subsequent

27

employers, if any) – and for this discovery only – shall be extended to

28

August 5, 2016;
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST
Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK)

1



Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 37-3, no motion to compel fact discovery

2

by Defendant in relation to the above-discussed discovery may be filed

3

more than 7 days after the amended fact discovery cut-off of August 5,

4

2016;

5



No other deadlines or dates set forth in the operative Scheduling Order

6

issued on May 13, 2016 (Dkt. No. 69) shall be altered or otherwise

7

affected by this Order.

8
9

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

M ILLER L AW G ROUP

A P RO F E SSIO NAL C O RPO RATIO N
C ALIF O RNIA

12

Dated: June 17, 2016

________________________
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
4830-0069-2274, v. 1

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST
Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK)