Hall v. GranCare, LLC et al
Filing
35
ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS To facilitate the orderly resolution of the above-referenced motions, the Court hereby CONTINUES the hearing on Hall's motion for remand to July 31, 2015, and hereby CONTINUES the hearings on MHC and MHCM's motions to dismiss to August 21, 2015. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 29, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2015)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
PRICE J. HALL,
No. 15-2201 MMC
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS
v.
GRANCARE, LLC dba VALE HEALTHCARE
CENTER; MARINER HEALTH CARE
MANAGEMENT COMPANY; MARINER
HEALTH CARE, INC.; FAS, LLC; REMY
RHODES, and DOES 100,
Defendants.
/
13
14
Before the Court are four motions: (1) Plaintiff Price J. Hall’s (“Hall”) motion for
15
remand, filed June 11, 2015, and noticed for hearing July 17, 2015; (2) defendant Mariner
16
Health Care, Inc.’s (“MHC”) motion to dismiss, filed May 22, 2015, and noticed for hearing
17
July 24, 2015; (3) defendant Mariner Health Care Management Company’s (“MHCM”)
18
motion to dismiss, filed May 22, 2015, and noticed for hearing July 24, 2015; and (4)
19
defendant GranCare, LLC d/b/a Vale Healthcare Center (“Vale”), MHC, and MHCM’s
20
motion for leave to file an amended notice of removal, filed June 25, 2015, and noticed for
21
hearing July 31, 2015.
22
To facilitate the orderly resolution of the above-referenced motions, the Court hereby
23
CONTINUES the hearing on Hall’s motion for remand to July 31, 2015, and hereby
24
CONTINUES the hearings on MHC and MHCM’s motions to dismiss to August 21, 2015.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 29, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?