Hall v. GranCare, LLC et al

Filing 35

ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS To facilitate the orderly resolution of the above-referenced motions, the Court hereby CONTINUES the hearing on Hall's motion for remand to July 31, 2015, and hereby CONTINUES the hearings on MHC and MHCM's motions to dismiss to August 21, 2015. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 29, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 PRICE J. HALL, No. 15-2201 MMC 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS v. GRANCARE, LLC dba VALE HEALTHCARE CENTER; MARINER HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY; MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC.; FAS, LLC; REMY RHODES, and DOES 100, Defendants. / 13 14 Before the Court are four motions: (1) Plaintiff Price J. Hall’s (“Hall”) motion for 15 remand, filed June 11, 2015, and noticed for hearing July 17, 2015; (2) defendant Mariner 16 Health Care, Inc.’s (“MHC”) motion to dismiss, filed May 22, 2015, and noticed for hearing 17 July 24, 2015; (3) defendant Mariner Health Care Management Company’s (“MHCM”) 18 motion to dismiss, filed May 22, 2015, and noticed for hearing July 24, 2015; and (4) 19 defendant GranCare, LLC d/b/a Vale Healthcare Center (“Vale”), MHC, and MHCM’s 20 motion for leave to file an amended notice of removal, filed June 25, 2015, and noticed for 21 hearing July 31, 2015. 22 To facilitate the orderly resolution of the above-referenced motions, the Court hereby 23 CONTINUES the hearing on Hall’s motion for remand to July 31, 2015, and hereby 24 CONTINUES the hearings on MHC and MHCM’s motions to dismiss to August 21, 2015. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 29, 2015 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?