Freeslate, Inc. v. Chemspeed Technologies AG et al
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 . Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/23/15. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2015)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 15-2233 WHA
CHEMSPEED TECHNOLOGIES AG and
CHEMSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
ORDER DENYING PRO
HAC VICE APPLICATIONS
The pro hac vice applications of Attorneys Thomas Carter, Michelle Eber, Scott
Partridge, and Thomas Rooney (Dkt. No. 42–45) are DENIED for failing to comply with Local
Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he or she is an active member in
good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the
District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form
from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as
“the bar of Texas” — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific
court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be
processed until a corrected form is submitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 23, 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?