Sepulveda et al v. Con-Way Freight, Inc. et al
Filing
25
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 24 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
BARRETT K. GREEN, Bar No. 145393
bgreen@littler.com
COURTNEY S. HOBSON, Bar No. 252322
chobson@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067.3107
Telephone:
310.553.0308
Facsimile:
310.553.5583
Attorneys for Defendant
CON-WAY FREIGHT INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
ROBERT ANTHONY SEPULVEDA,
ZENEN PEREZ FLORES, ERNESTO
TORRES GONZALES, and ARTEM
ONICHEV,
13
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 15-cv-02272-HSG
ORDER GRANTING CON-WAY’S
REQUEST FOR COUNSEL TO APPEAR
AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
BY TELEPHONE
14
v.
[Local Rule 16-10(a)]
15
16
CON-WAY FREIGHT, INC., a
corporation, and DOES 1 through 25,
inclusive,
Date:
Aug. 18, 2015
Time:
2:00 p.m.
Place:
Courtroom 15
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
2049 Century Park East
5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107
310.553.0308
(CASE NO. 15-CV-02272-HSG)
1
ORDER
2
3
The Court, having considered Defendant Con-way Freight Inc.’s counsel’s request to
4
participate in the Case Management Conference scheduled for August 18, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in
5
Courtroom 15 by telephone (the “Request”), it is HEREBY ORDERED that Con-way’s Request is
6
GRANTED. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the
7
telephonic appearance.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 12, 2015
10
11
HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
U.S. District Judge
12
13
Firmwide:135269482.1 012187.1096
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
2049 Century Park East
5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107
310.553.0308
(CASE NO. 15-CV-02272-HSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?