Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Virgin America, Inc. filed by Virgin America, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 18, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Monique Olivier, Esq., State Bar No. 190385
DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ OLIVIER LLP
100 Bush Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Alison Kosinski, Esq., State Bar No. 261676
Emily Thiagaraj, Esq., State Bar No. 284634
KOSINSKI + THIAGARAJ, LLP
22 Battery Street, Suite 888
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JULIA BERNSTEIN and Putative Class

11
12

Additional counsel on following page

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

JULIA BERNSTEIN, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated,

18

Plaintiffs,

19
20
21

Case No. 3:15-cv-02277-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

vs.
VIRGIN AMERICA, INC.; and Does 1-10,
inclusive;
Defendants.

22

Date Action Filed:
Trial Date:

March 18, 2015
None Set

Assigned to Hon. Jon S. Tigar

23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

DB2/ 26107642.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Case No. 3:15-cv-02277-JST

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

ROBERT JON HENDRICKS, State Bar No. 179751
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1596
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
JENNIFER A. TOMLIN, State Bar No. 261220
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
VIRGIN AMERICA, INC.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

DB2/ 26107642.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Case No. 3:15-cv-02277-JST

1
2
3
4
5

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

6

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

7

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

8
9
10
11

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in
an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need
for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:

12

Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

13

The Parties agree to select a mediator by August 26, 2015.

14

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

15
16

other requested deadline

Mediation

March 2016

17
18

Dated: August 12, 2015

DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ
OLIVIER LLP

19

KOSINSKI + THIAGARAJ, LLP

20
By Monique Olivier (authorized on 8/12/15)
Monique Olivier

21
22

Attorneys for Plaintiff
JULIA BERNSTEIN and Putative Class

23
24

Dated: August 12, 2015

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

25

By Robert Jon Hendricks
Robert Jon Hendricks
Jennifer A. Tomlin
Attorneys for Defendant
VIRGIN AMERICA, INC.

26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

DB2/ 26107642.1

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Case No. 3:15-cv-02277-JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to the Stipulation above:

3

X

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

__________________________________________________________________

6

__________________________________________________________________

7

ISTRIC
__________________________________________________________________
ES D
T

RT

12

i ga r

HON. JON S. TIGAR e Jon S. T
Judg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ER

14

A

H

13

FO

DATED: August 18, 2015

NO

11

LI

10

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

R NIA

S
IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

9

C

RT
U
O

8

T
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

DB2/ 26107642.1

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Case No. 3:15-cv-02277-JST