Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.
Filing
24
SCHEDULING ORDER. Motion Hearing set for 8/25/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 26, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
JULIA BERNSTEIN,
Case No. 15-cv-02277-JST
Plaintiff,
9
v.
SCHEDULING ORDER
10
11
VIRGIN AMERICA, INC.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
12
13
14
15
The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:
16
Event
Deadline
17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings
October 30, 2015
Class or collective certification motion
May 19, 2016
20
Opposition to class or collective certification motion
July 14, 2016
21
Reply to class or collective certification motion
August 11, 2016
22
Hearing date on motion for class or collective certification
August 25, 2016
18
19
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court will also set a telephonic case management conference on October 30, 2015 at
2:00 p.m. The parties are ordered to provide a call-in number to the courtroom deputy at least 24
hours beforehand.
The Court will set remaining dates, including discovery cut-off and trial dates, following
resolution of any motions for class or collective certification.
1
2
3
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
4
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
5
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
6
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
7
Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-
9
controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
10
a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
8
to grant a continuance.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 26, 2015
14
15
16
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?