Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.

Filing 24

SCHEDULING ORDER. Motion Hearing set for 8/25/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 26, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JULIA BERNSTEIN, Case No. 15-cv-02277-JST Plaintiff, 9 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 10 11 VIRGIN AMERICA, INC., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 13 14 15 The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10: 16 Event Deadline 17 Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings October 30, 2015 Class or collective certification motion May 19, 2016 20 Opposition to class or collective certification motion July 14, 2016 21 Reply to class or collective certification motion August 11, 2016 22 Hearing date on motion for class or collective certification August 25, 2016 18 19 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court will also set a telephonic case management conference on October 30, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. The parties are ordered to provide a call-in number to the courtroom deputy at least 24 hours beforehand. The Court will set remaining dates, including discovery cut-off and trial dates, following resolution of any motions for class or collective certification. 1 2 3 Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders. The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 4 counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 5 manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 6 calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 7 Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party- 9 controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 10 a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 8 to grant a continuance. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 26, 2015 14 15 16 _______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?