Total Recall Technologies v. Palmer Luckey, et al

Filing 126

ORDER REFERRING FURTHER DISCOVERY DISPUTES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/4/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. C 15-02281 WHA v. PALMER LUCKEY and OCULUS VR, LLC, as successor-in-interest to Oculus VR, Inc., 15 ORDER REFERRING FURTHER DISCOVERY DISPUTES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. / 16 17 We have already had four discovery disputes in this matter, and now there are two more 18 pending. The two further motions for discovery relief relating to transcripts from the Zenimax 19 case, unlogged redactions, and privilege assertions over communications between Igra and Seidl 20 are hereby REFERRED to a magistrate judge for assignment at random by the Clerk of Court. It 21 is the responsibility of counsel to make sure these issues are pursued before the magistrate 22 judge in a timely manner and in accordance with that judge’s procedure. All future discovery 23 problems are likewise referred to the magistrate judge. The Court does not intend to extend the 24 discovery deadline. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: April 4, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?