Total Recall Technologies v. Palmer Luckey, et al
ORDER REFERRING FURTHER DISCOVERY DISPUTES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/4/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2016)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 15-02281 WHA
PALMER LUCKEY and OCULUS VR,
LLC, as successor-in-interest to Oculus
ORDER REFERRING FURTHER
TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
We have already had four discovery disputes in this matter, and now there are two more
pending. The two further motions for discovery relief relating to transcripts from the Zenimax
case, unlogged redactions, and privilege assertions over communications between Igra and Seidl
are hereby REFERRED to a magistrate judge for assignment at random by the Clerk of Court. It
is the responsibility of counsel to make sure these issues are pursued before the magistrate
judge in a timely manner and in accordance with that judge’s procedure. All future discovery
problems are likewise referred to the magistrate judge. The Court does not intend to extend the
IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 4, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?