Total Recall Technologies v. Palmer Luckey, et al
Filing
41
ORDER REQUESTING COMMENT FROM DEFENDANTS re 40 Amended Complaint filed by Total Recall Technologies Responses due by 9/2/2015.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/1/15. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. C 15-02281 WHA
v.
OCULUS VR, INC., and PALMER
LUCKEY
ORDER REQUESTING
COMMENT FROM
DEFENDANTS
Defendants.
15
/
16
On August 31, plaintiff filed an amended complaint in lieu of responding to defendants’
17
18
motion to dismiss. By SEPTEMBER 2 AT NOON, defendants shall inform the Court whether the
19
amended complaint addresses the arguments raised in their motion to dismiss such that the
20
motion should be denied as moot, without prejudice to a renewed motion to dismiss based on the
21
amended pleadings.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
September 1, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?