Total Recall Technologies v. Palmer Luckey, et al

Filing 41

ORDER REQUESTING COMMENT FROM DEFENDANTS re 40 Amended Complaint filed by Total Recall Technologies Responses due by 9/2/2015.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/1/15. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. C 15-02281 WHA v. OCULUS VR, INC., and PALMER LUCKEY ORDER REQUESTING COMMENT FROM DEFENDANTS Defendants. 15 / 16 On August 31, plaintiff filed an amended complaint in lieu of responding to defendants’ 17 18 motion to dismiss. By SEPTEMBER 2 AT NOON, defendants shall inform the Court whether the 19 amended complaint addresses the arguments raised in their motion to dismiss such that the 20 motion should be denied as moot, without prejudice to a renewed motion to dismiss based on the 21 amended pleadings. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 1, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?