Total Recall Technologies v. Palmer Luckey, et al

Filing 550

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL INTERROGATORY RESPONSES. By Judge Alsup.(whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2021)

Case 3:15-cv-02281-WHA Document 550 Filed 10/21/21 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES,
Plaintiff,

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

No. C 15-02281 WHA

v.
PALMER LUCKEY,
Defendant.

13

ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO SEAL INTERROGATORY
RESPONSES

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiff seeks to seal the entirety of documents submitted in support of defendant’s
motions in limine based on their designation as confidential (Dkt. 461). The documents
include Luckey’s response to the first set of interrogatories, the amended responses to those
interrogatories, a correction to the amended responses, and both Luckey and Oculus’s separate
responses to a fourth set of interrogatories. Plaintiff takes no position on whether these
documents warrant sealing and defendant has not submitted a declaration opposing the motion.
No compelling reasons for sealing have been given, there is little privacy interest in the
responses, and some of the responses were used as impeachment evidence at trial. The motion
is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: October 21, 2021.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE