Total Recall Technologies v. Palmer Luckey, et al
Filing
61
AMENDED ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS DISCOVERY LETTER AND VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS re 59 Order on Discovery Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/13/15. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES,
10
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
12
13
No. C 15-02281 WHA
v.
PALMER LUCKEY and OCULUS VR,
INC.,
Defendants.
14
/
AMENDED ORDER RE
PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY
LETTER AND VACATING
HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
15
16
Following a hearing on the parties’ discovery dispute, defendants are hereby ordered as
17
follows: (i) defendants shall assert any objections to plaintiff’s outstanding discovery requests
18
within ONE WEEK, (ii) all objections shall be resolved and production completed within FOUR
19
WEEKS,
(iii) defendants’ pending motion to dismiss shall be held in abeyance until all objections
20
are fully resolved and production is complete. The hearing on that motion scheduled for
21
OCTOBER 29 is VACATED. This does not affect the briefing schedule.
22
Plaintiff has elected to stand by the categories of confidential information that it has
23
identified. If it is later revealed that plaintiff could have identified the confidential information
24
at issue more specifically at this stage and that the disclosures made were too vague, plaintiff
25
will be precluded from asserting claims based on inadequately disclosed confidential
26
information.
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
Dated: October 13, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?