Total Recall Technologies v. Palmer Luckey, et al

Filing 61

AMENDED ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS DISCOVERY LETTER AND VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS re 59 Order on Discovery Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/13/15. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES, 10 Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 12 13 No. C 15-02281 WHA v. PALMER LUCKEY and OCULUS VR, INC., Defendants. 14 / AMENDED ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY LETTER AND VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 15 16 Following a hearing on the parties’ discovery dispute, defendants are hereby ordered as 17 follows: (i) defendants shall assert any objections to plaintiff’s outstanding discovery requests 18 within ONE WEEK, (ii) all objections shall be resolved and production completed within FOUR 19 WEEKS, (iii) defendants’ pending motion to dismiss shall be held in abeyance until all objections 20 are fully resolved and production is complete. The hearing on that motion scheduled for 21 OCTOBER 29 is VACATED. This does not affect the briefing schedule. 22 Plaintiff has elected to stand by the categories of confidential information that it has 23 identified. If it is later revealed that plaintiff could have identified the confidential information 24 at issue more specifically at this stage and that the disclosures made were too vague, plaintiff 25 will be precluded from asserting claims based on inadequately disclosed confidential 26 information. 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 Dated: October 13, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?