Carroll v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 141

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 140 SETTING FORTH DATA SECURITY PROTOCOLS GOVERNING PRODUCTION AND HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEE DATA filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo & Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/22/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Andrew M. McNaught (SBN 209093) 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 amcnaught@seyfarth.com PADILLA & RODRIGUEZ, LLP John M. Padilla (SBN 279815) jpadilla@pandrlaw.com 601 S. Figueroa St., Suite 4050 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 244-1401 Facsimile: (213) 244-1402 Richard L. Alfred (SBN 015000) (pro hac vice) Two Seaport Lane, Suite 300 Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Telephone: (617) 946-4802 Facsimile: (617) 946-4801 ralfred@seyfarth.com WILLS LAW FIRM, PLLC Rhonda H. Wills (pro hac vice) rwills@rwillslawfirm.com Genevieve Estrada (pro hac vice) gestrada@rwillslawfirm.com 1776 Yorktown, Suite 570 Houston, Texas 77056 Telephone: (713) 528-4455 Facsimile: (713) 528-2047 8 9 10 11 Timothy M. Watson (SBN 20963575) (pro hac vice) 700 Milam Street, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas 77002-2812 Telephone: (713) 225-2300 Facsimile: (713) 225-2340 twatson@seyfarth.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs KELLY CARROLL, CHRYSTIANE LAYOG, and the Putative Class 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 21 KELLY CARROLL, CHRYSTIANE LAYOG, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 22 23 24 Case No. 3:15-CV-02321 EMC STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER SETTING FORTH DATA SECURITY PROTOCOLS GOVERNING THE PRODUCTION AND HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEE DATA; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SAME Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 25 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen Defendants. 26 27 28 1 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE PRODUCTION AND HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL DATA AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SAME - CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02321 EMC 35801800v.1 1 1. 2 PURPOSE Disclosure and discovery activity in this action will involve the production of data for current 3 and former employees of Defendants, including time and pay records, and personal contact information. 4 Wells Fargo contends this data is protected by third party privacy rights, which Wells Fargo is not 5 authorized to waive. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 6 following Stipulated Protective Order Setting Forth Data Security Protocols Governing the Production 7 and Handling of Employee Data Designated as Confidential, which will be effective along with the prior 8 Stipulated Protective Order entered by this Court on July 6, 2016 (“Prior Order”). The Prior Order is 9 incorporated herein by reference and made part of this order. 10 To maintain the security of its private employee data, and as the custodian of such data, to 11 protect against potential data breaches, Wells Fargo must ensure that appropriate information security 12 protocols are observed in connection with the production and handling of such data. Because the data 13 already ordered produced includes employee time and pay records, personal contact information, and 14 Employee ID numbers for putative class members, Wells Fargo will be designating and treating this data 15 as “Confidential” under the terms of the prior Stipulated Protective Order that was entered by this Court 16 on July 6, 2016. This Stipulated Protective Order Setting Forth Data Security Protocols Governing the 17 Production and Handling of Confidential Employee Data is meant to supplement the prior Stipulated 18 Protective Order, which remains in effect. 19 2. 20 21 22 23 24 DATA PROTECTION PROTOCOLS Wells Fargo will observe the following protocols in connection with the provision of private data, pursuant to modern generally accepted information security standards: 1. Three copies of the production will be produced on three hard drives that feature hardware level encryption to protect the data in transit; 2. Beyond the hardware level encryption, the production data itself will be contained within a 25 VeraCrypt container that is protected by both a complex password and a keyfile. VeraCrypt is an open- 26 source cryptography software that has been extensively audited by information security experts to be a 27 secure method of data protection; 28 1 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE PRODUCTION AND HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL DATA AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SAME - CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02321 EMC 35801800v.1 1 3. Upon confirmation of delivery of the package to Plaintiffs’ counsel, Wells Fargo will 2 provide the following information via three separate communication methods in order to facilitate 3 Plaintiffs’ access to the data: 4 a. The six digit hardware decryption PIN code; 5 b. The VeraCrypt password; 6 c. The VeraCrypt key file. 7 4. Wells Fargo will also provide Plaintiffs’ counsel a very short guide on how to operate 8 VeraCrypt. Following the guide, accessing this data will take no more than five minutes. 9 5. Everything Plaintiffs’ counsel needs to access the underlying data will be provided to 10 them by Wells Fargo. Plaintiffs’ counsel will not need to purchase any third party software to access the 11 data, or incur any expense whatsoever. By executing this document, Plaintiffs’ counsel confirms that in 12 accordance with the confidential and sensitive nature of the private data to be produced, that they and 13 their employees, and any experts they retain, will ensure this data remains encrypted while it is at rest 14 and not being used. 15 6. Further, by executing this document, Plaintiffs’ counsel confirms that in addition to the 16 safeguards in paragraph 5, they will lock up the hard-drives in a secure location when not using the data. 17 As noted, the private data to be produced will fall within the bounds of the Stipulated Protective Order 18 filed July 6, 2016, and all of the provisions of that Order remain in effect and apply to the production of 19 private employee data. Plaintiffs’ counsel’s execution of this document further confirms their 20 willingness and ability, and that of any expert(s) they retain, to adhere to the protocols described herein 21 while this data is in the possession, custody, and control of Plaintiffs’ counsel and any experts they 22 retain. 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE PRODUCTION AND HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL DATA AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SAME - CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02321 EMC 35801800v.1 1 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I certify that all other signatories listed, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 3 4 Dated: November 21, 2016 /s/ Andrew M. McNaught Andrew M. McNaught Dated: November 21, 2016 /s/ John M. Padilla John M. Padilla Counsel for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE PRODUCTION AND HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL DATA AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SAME - CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02321 EMC 35801800v.1 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ counsel and any experts they retain comply with the provisions of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11/22/2016 RED Hon. Edward IS SO ORDE M. Chen 7 IT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg 8 RT ER H 10 FO NO 9 LI 6 RT U O 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA 11 A 4 R NIA 3 S 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE PRODUCTION AND HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL DATA UNIT ED 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE PRODUCTION AND HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL DATA AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SAME - CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02321 EMC 35801800v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?