Carroll v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 213

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying Plaintiffs' 205 4/4/17 Administrative Motion leave to further supplement the record. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KELLY CARROLL, ET AL., Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 3:15-cv-02321-EMC (KAW) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' 4/4/17 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FURTHER SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD Re: Dkt. No. 205 12 On March 16, 2017, the Court held a hearing on Non-Party Carrie Tolstedt’s motion to 13 14 quash the deposition subpoena. On April 4, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a second administrative motion 15 seeking leave to file supplemental materials in support of their opposition to the motion to quash. 16 (Pls.’ Mot., Dkt. No. 200.) Specifically, Plaintiffs seek leave to submit the deposition transcript of 17 named plaintiff Antonio Ponce in support of their opposition to the motion to quash, because Mr. 18 Ponce testified that, as a service-side employee, he had to work late to meet his sales goals. (Pls.’ 19 Mot., Dkt. No. 205 at 1-2.) 20 On April 7, 2017, Non-Party Carrie Tolstedt filed an opposition requesting that the Court 21 deny the administrative motion on the grounds that the deposition testimony was self-serving and 22 that “[t]he introduction of additional evidence regarding that issue, weeks after the Motion to 23 Quash has been fully briefed and argued, is unwarranted and procedurally improper.” (Tolstedt 24 Opp’n, Dkt. No. 209 at 1.) The Court agrees. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 The Court will decide the pending motion to quash based on the current briefing and oral 2 argument, and Plaintiffs are asked to refrain from further unnecessary motion practice regarding 3 the pending motion. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 10, 2017 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?