Best-Santos v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 42

ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER BRIEFING AND CONTINUING HEARING. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/29/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

BARBARA BEST-SANTOS,

Case No. 15-cv-02323-RS

Plaintiff,
10
v.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER
BRIEFING AND CONTINUING
HEARING

Defendants.
13
14
15

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. was ordered to show cause why it contends it must or

16

should be released from its commitment to offer plaintiff a loan modification review. In response,

17

Wells Fargo timely filed a declaration of counsel. Although not called for by the order to show

18

cause, nor expressly permitted by the rules, plaintiff thereafter filed a brief responding to the

19

declaration. No later than March 7, 2016, Wells Fargo shall file a reply to plaintiff’s brief,

20

addressing the arguments raised therein. The hearing on the motion to dismiss set for March 3,

21

2016 is hereby continued to March 24, 2016.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: February 29, 2016
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge