Rodgers v. Panera, LLC et al
Filing
26
ORDER granting 3rd request to extend time to respond to complaint. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 8/25/15. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2015)
S
6
LI
ER
FO
ston
usan Ill
A
Attorneys for Defendant
TKG RE Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
formerly known as TKG Pinole, LLC
R NIA
Judge S
TED
H
5
GRAN
RT
4
UNIT
ED
3
COX, CASTLE & NICHOLSON LLP
ALI P. HAMIDI (STATE BAR NO. 191198)
ahamidi@coxcastle.com
555 California Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104-1513
Telephone: (415) 262-5100
Facsimile: (415) 262-5199
RT
U
O
2
NO
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN RODGERS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02330-SI
THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
vs.
Complaint filed: May 25, 2015
Complaint served: June 25, 2015
New response date: September 8, 2015
PANERA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, dba PANERA BREAD; TKG
PINOLE, LLC, a California limited liability
company; and DOES 1 – 20, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Defendant TKG RE Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, formerly known as
19
TKG PINOLE, LLC, (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff JOHN RODGERS (“Plaintiff”) stipulate to a two-
20
week extension for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s initial complaint. The new response date shall
21
be September 8, 2015.
22
DATED: August 24, 2015
Stipulated and respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF IRENE KARBELASHVILI
23
By:
24
25
DATED: August 24, 2015
/s/ Irene Karbelashvili
Irene Karbelashvili
Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN RODGERS
COX, CASTLE & NICHOLSON LLP
26
By:
27
28
/s/ Ali P. Hamidi
Ali P. Hamidi
Attorneys for Defendant TKG PINOLE, LLC
LAW OFFICES OF
COX, CASTLE &
NICHOLSON LLP
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
073051\7047364v3
CASE NO. 4:15-cv-02330-SI
THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?