Rodgers v. Panera, LLC et al

Filing 26

ORDER granting 3rd request to extend time to respond to complaint. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 8/25/15. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2015)

Download PDF
S 6 LI ER FO ston usan Ill A Attorneys for Defendant TKG RE Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, formerly known as TKG Pinole, LLC R NIA Judge S TED H 5 GRAN RT 4 UNIT ED 3 COX, CASTLE & NICHOLSON LLP ALI P. HAMIDI (STATE BAR NO. 191198) ahamidi@coxcastle.com 555 California Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-1513 Telephone: (415) 262-5100 Facsimile: (415) 262-5199 RT U O 2 NO 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN RODGERS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02330-SI THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT vs. Complaint filed: May 25, 2015 Complaint served: June 25, 2015 New response date: September 8, 2015 PANERA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dba PANERA BREAD; TKG PINOLE, LLC, a California limited liability company; and DOES 1 – 20, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Defendant TKG RE Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, formerly known as 19 TKG PINOLE, LLC, (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff JOHN RODGERS (“Plaintiff”) stipulate to a two- 20 week extension for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s initial complaint. The new response date shall 21 be September 8, 2015. 22 DATED: August 24, 2015 Stipulated and respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF IRENE KARBELASHVILI 23 By: 24 25 DATED: August 24, 2015 /s/ Irene Karbelashvili Irene Karbelashvili Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN RODGERS COX, CASTLE & NICHOLSON LLP 26 By: 27 28 /s/ Ali P. Hamidi Ali P. Hamidi Attorneys for Defendant TKG PINOLE, LLC LAW OFFICES OF COX, CASTLE & NICHOLSON LLP SAN FRANCISCO, CA 073051\7047364v3 CASE NO. 4:15-cv-02330-SI THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?