Jensen v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc et al

Filing 40

ORDER granting 38 STIPULATION to Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference continued to 5/3/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 4/26/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/28/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 LAW OFFICES OF WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY & SCHOENBERGER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 650 CALIFORNIA STREET, 26TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108-2615 (415) 981-7210 6 KHALDOUN A. BAGHDADI (State Bar #190111) kbaghdadi@walkuplawoffice.com DORIS CHENG (State Bar #197731) dcheng@walkuplawoffice.com 7 Michael Jensen 8 13 ALEXANDER G. CALFO (SBN 152891) ACalfo@kslaw.com JULIA E. ROMANO (SBN 260857) JRomano@kslaw.com STACY L. FOSTER (SBN 285544) Stacy.Foster@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 4200 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 443-4355 Facsimile: (213) 443-4310 14 Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. 5 9 10 11 12 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 MICHAEL JENSEN, Case No. 3:15-cv-02340-WHO 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 22 23 24 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., DePUY SYNTHES SALES, INC., CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC., AND DOES ONE through FIFTY, Defendants. 25 26 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 27 Whereas, the parties are set for a Case Management Conference on March 29, 2016; 28 Whereas, counsel for defendant is currently engaged in trial before the Honorable Richard JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02340-WHO 1 Arnold, in the County of Fairfield, State of Connecticut; 2 3 Whereas, the parties have commenced and are continuing settlement discussions, with the goal of setting a mediation within the next 30 days; 4 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, and subject to approval of the Court, that the 5 Case Management Conference currently set for March 29, 2016 be continued to May 3, 2016 or as 6 soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. 7 8 9 Respectfully submitted, Dated: WALKUP , M ELODIA , K ELLY & S CHOENBERGER 10 /s/ Khaldoun A. Baghdadi KHALDOUN A. BAGHDADI Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL JENSEN 11 12 13 Dated: K ING & S PALDING , LLP 14 15 16 17 /s/ Alexander G. Calfo ALEXANDER G. CALFO Attorneys for Defendant CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. 18 19 20 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5.1(i) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I, Khaldoun A. Baghdadi, hereby attest that I have 21 obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatories to this document. 22 I declare under penalty of perjury under the law of the United States of America that the 23 foregoing is true and correct. Executed March __, 2016 at San Francisco, California. 24 25 26 /s/ Khaldoun A. Baghdadi KHALDOUN A. BAGHDADI 27 LAW OFFICES OF 28 WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY & SCHOENBERGER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 650 CALIFORNIA STREET 26TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 (415) 981-7210 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02340-WHO 1 ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 2 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The Case Management 3 Conference currently set for Tuesday, March 29, 2016 is continued to Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 4 2:00 p.m. 5 6 Dated: March 28, 2016 7 8 9 HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LAW OFFICES OF 28 WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY & SCHOENBERGER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 650 CALIFORNIA STREET 26TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 (415) 981-7210 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02340-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?