Jensen v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc et al

Filing 50

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO WARN CLAIMS - Defendant withdraws 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment as moot. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/12/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 ALEXANDER G. CALFO (SBN 152891) ACalfo@kslaw.com 2 JULIA E. ROMANO (SBN 260857) 3 JRomano@kslaw.com STACY L. FOSTER (SBN 285544) 4 Stacy.Foster@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 5 333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 4200 Los Angeles, California 90071 6 Telephone: (213) 443-4355 (213) 443-4310 7 Facsimile: 8 Attorneys for Defendant CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 Case No. 3:15-cv-02340-WHO 14 MICHAEL JENSEN, 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO WARN CLAIMS Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., et. 18 al., Defendants. 19 20 21 WHEREAS on November 30, 2016 defendant CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. 22 (“Defendant”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff MICHAEL JENSEN’s 23 (“Plaintiff”) second and third causes of action for failure to warn based on the learned 24 25 26 27 28 intermediary doctrine. (Dkt. No. 48.) The Motion is currently set for hearing on January 4, 2017. WHEREAS the parties have met and conferred regarding the Motion and hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1 3:15-cv-02340-WHO STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO WARN CLAIMS 1 2 3 4 5 1. Plaintiff agrees to dismiss his failure to warn claims without prejudice. 2. Defendant agrees to withdraw its Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 48) as moot. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, 6 7 Dated: December 9, 2016 December 12, 2016 WALKUP MELODIA KELLEY & SCHOENBERGER 8 9 By: /s/ Khaldoun A. Baghdadi Matthew D. Davis Khaldoun A. Baghdadi Doris Cheng Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL JENSEN 10 11 12 13 14 Dated: December 9, 2016 KING & SPALDING LLP 15 16 17 18 19 By: /s/ Julia E. Romano Alexander G. Calfo Julia E. Romano Stacy L. Foster Attorneys for Defendant CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 3:15-cv-02340-WHO STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO WARN CLAIMS 1 ORDER 2 3 Pursuant to stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff MICHAEL JENSEN’s 4 Second Cause of Action for Strict Liability Failure to Warn and Third Cause of Action for 5 Negligent Warnings are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Defendant CODMAN & 6 SHURTLEFF, INC.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 48) is deemed withdrawn and 7 taken off calendar. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________ Hon. William H. Orrick U.S. District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 3:15-cv-02340-WHO STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO WARN CLAIMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?