McKay v. Knoerzer et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON by Hon. William Alsup granting 45 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 Jeffrey D. Polsky (SBN 120975) jpolsky(a)foxrothschild.com 2 FOX ROTHSCIDLD LLP 345 California Street, Suite 2200 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.364.5540 4 Facstmile: 415.391.4436 5 Attorneys for Defendants MICHAEL ANTHONY KNOERZER and 6 CLYDE&COLLP 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ll JOHNMcKAY, 12 13 Case No.: 3:15-cv-02347 WHA Plaintiff, vs. 14 MICHAEL ANTHONY KNOERZER and CLYDE&CO. LLP, 15 Defendants. STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL Wim PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON 16 1~------------------------~ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ACTIVE 38S48613vl SI IPOLA lioN FOR DISMissAL AND ORDER THEREON cAsĀ£ NO. 3: I S::CV:02347 wHA I Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedw-e 41(aXIXA)(ii), Plaintiff John McKay and 2 Defendants Michael Anthony Knoerzer and Clyde & Co. LLP hereby stipulate that this action and 3 all claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendants in this action are hereby dismissed, in their 4 entirety, with prejudice. It is further stipulated that each party shall bearits own attorneys' fees and 5 costs, and that each party hereby waives any right to appeal. Any and all remaining issues are 6 waived. :TAIJt1. Afly If(; 2. DI (:, 7 Dated: IJe;tAl"er 2m 5 = ~ 8 JOHN D. MCKAY By John D. McKav Plaintiff ProSe 9 10 Dated: December_, 2015 11 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP By Je(frev D. fols/cv Jeffiey D. Polsky Attorneys for Defendants MICHAEL ANTHONY KNOERZER and CLYDE & CO. LLP 12 13 14 ORDER 15 PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 19 Dated: January 26, 2016. William H. Alsup United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ACTIVE 38S48613vl 2 S'IIPOLA lioN FOR olsMISSAL AND ORDER l'HEREON CASĀ£ NO. 3:13:CV::o2347 wRA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?