Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Buy Mac Now LLC et al
Filing
22
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT Defendants are hereby ordered to immediately submit a chambers copy of their answer. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 6, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. C 15-2367 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
BUY MAC NOW, LLC et al.,
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
On July 31, 2015, defendants Buy Mac Now, LLC, Judy Bahaeddin, and Omar
18
Bahaeddin (collectively “Defendants”) electronically filed a document titled “Answer to
19
Complaint.” Defendants have violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s
20
Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each
21
document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7);
22
see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
23
¶ 2.
24
Defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
25
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above26
referenced document. Defendants are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to
27
comply with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically28
filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from
1
the record any electronically-filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely
2
provided to the Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: August 6, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?