United Energy Trading, LLC v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. et al

Filing 135


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP Thomas D. Leland (Pro Hac) Leah E. Capritta (Pro Hac) 633 Seventeenth Street, Suite 2300 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone (303) 974-6660 Fax: (303) 974-6659 Email: thomas.leland@hklaw.com leah.capritta@hklaw.com 6 7 8 9 10 Charles L. Coleman III (65496) 50 California Street, Suite 2800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 743-6900 Fax: (415) 743-6910 E-mail: charles.coleman@hklaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED ENERGY TRADING, LLC 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 UNITED ENERGY TRADING, LLC, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-2383-RS 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 19 20 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California corporation; ALBERT TORRES, an individual; BILL CHEN, an individual; TANISHA ROBINSON, an individual, 21 Defendants. 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO PRODUCE EXPERT AND EXPERT REBUTTAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 61(b), 6-2, 7-12 Action Filed: May 28, 2015 Current Deadlines: Jan. 9, 2017 and Apr. 18, 2017 New Deadlines: Apr. 10, 2017 and June 19, 2017 23 [Stipulation and Declaration of Leah E. Capritta in support thereof filed concurrently herewith] 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:15-CV-2383-RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME 2 The Stipulated Request to Extend Time to Produce Expert and Expert Rebuttal 3 Disclosures, Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-12 (“Stipulated Request”), agreed to by 4 Plaintiff United Energy Trading, LLC (“UET”) and Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric 5 Company (“PG&E”), Albert Torres, Bill Chen and Tanisha Robinson (collectively, the 6 “Individual Defendants,” and together with PG&E, the “Defendants”), was submitted for Court 7 approval on December 20, 2016. Having considered the Stipulated Request, and all other 8 pleadings and papers on file in this Action, the Court rules as follows: 9 10 WHEREAS plaintiff, United Energy Trading, LLC (“UET”), filed this action on May 28, 2015; 11 WHEREAS, on May 13, 2016, UET filed its Second Amended Complaint; 12 WHEREAS, on August 25, 2016, Defendants Pacific Gas & Electric Company 13 (“PG&E”), Albert Torres, William Chen and Tanisha Robinson (collectively, the “Individual 14 Defendants,” and together with PG&E, the “Defendants”) filed an Answer to UET’s Second 15 Amended Complaint; 16 WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated and requested that the Court extend the 17 deadlines for expert discovery such that the parties would have until January 9, 2017 to file 18 Expert Disclosures and until April 18, 2017 to file Rebuttal Expert Disclosures (Dkt. 115); 19 WHEREAS, the Court granted that request (Dkt. 116); 20 WHEREAS, discovery is continuing and the parties are continuing to produce documents 21 22 23 24 in response to written Requests; WHEREAS, multiple discovery disputes regarding the timing and scope of production of additional documents by PG&E are pending before Magistrate Judge Kim; WHEREAS, the enlargement sought by this Stipulated Request will conserve resources 25 for all parties because it will ensure that the parties’ experts have adequate time to limit their 26 review to the information relevant to and prepare opinions on the live claims; 27 28 WHEREAS, all parties have agreed that they shall have until April 10, 2017 to file Expert Disclosures and until June 19, 2017 to file Rebuttal Expert Disclosures; Case No. 3:15-CV-2383-RS -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME 1 WHEREAS, good cause for this extension exists given the progress of the case to date; 2 WHEREAS, all parties have agreed that the current expert disclosure schedule required by 3 the Scheduling Order should be enlarged as follows: 4 5 Pleading Standard Schedule Stipulated Enlargement 6 Expert Disclosure Deadline January 9, 2017 April 10, 2017 7 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline April 18, 2017 June 19, 2017 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 WHEREAS, the stipulated enlargements are sought in advance of the expiration of any related disclosure deadline; WHEREAS, the stipulated disclosure enlargements do not affect any other existing dates set forth in the Scheduling Order; WHEREAS, none of the extensions sought by the Stipulated Request prejudice the parties or the Court; 15 Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 16 1. The date for the Parties to disclose Experts is extended from January 9, 2017 through 17 18 19 and including April 10, 2017; 2. The date for the Parties to disclose Rebuttal Experts is extended from April 18, 2017 through and including June 19, 2017. 20 21 December SO ORDERED this ______ day of _____, 2016. 21st 22 By: The Honorable Richard G. Seeborg United States District Court Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:15-CV-2383-RS -2- STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?