M/A Com Technology Solutions, Inc.-v-Integrated Semiconductor Service, Inc.

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by M/A Com Technology Solutions, Inc. Responses due by 6/26/2015. Replies due by 7/2/2015. Motion for Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 7/17/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/18/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

400 MAIN STREET, SUITE 250
LOS ALTOS, CALIFORNIA 94022
[phone]

THOITS LAW

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

11
12
13
14
15

to show cause as to why a preliminary injunction should not issue against defendants;
Whereas the Court set the deadline for defendants’ opposition to said motion to be due on
June 15, 2015 and plaintiff’s reply to be due on June 22, 2015;
Whereas since June 5, 2015, plaintiff has made attempts but has been unsuccessful in
locating Mr. Collins and effecting service on him;
Whereas on June 15, 2015, counsel for Mr. Collins, Vernon C. Goins, contacted
MACOM’s counsel and stated he would now be representing Mr. Collins in this case;
Whereas Mr. Goins requested that the June 29, 2015 hearing be continued to a later date
so as to allow time to file a response on behalf of Mr. Collins;
Whereas Mr. Goins has accepted service of the complaint and the court’s June 5, 2015
Order by e-mail on behalf of Mr. Collins;
Whereas Mr. Goins has agreed to produce Mr. Collins for deposition on June 19, 2015
at 400 Main Street, Suite 250, Los Altos, California;
Whereas, plaintiff and defendants agree to continue the June 29, 2015 hearing to July 17,
2015 or the first available date thereafter to be set by the Court;

16

Whereas, plaintiff and defendant agree that defendants’ opposition to said motion will be

17

due two weeks (14 calendar days) prior to the new hearing date and plaintiff’s reply will be due

18

one week (7 calendar days) prior to the new hearing date;

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Whereas, plaintiff and defendants agree that the Court’s June 5, 2015 Order shall remain
in effect up to and including the continued hearing date.
IT IS SO STIPLATED.
Dated: June 18, 2015.

THOITS LAW
/s/ Andrew P. Holland
Andrew P. Holland
Attorneys for Plaintiff
M/A-COM Technology Solutions Inc.

137224.007/709094v1
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION

July 17, 2015 at 2:00 pm.

RT

A

H

ER

n

M. Che

FO

NO

dward
Judge E

R NIA

DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO

LI

UNIT
ED

June 18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

Opposition due June 26, 2015.
Reply due July 2, 2015.

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C