Bennett-Wofford et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Filing
44
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying Plaintiffs' Request to Reschedule Settlement Conference 42 . The settlement conference will go forward on January 26, 2016 as originally scheduled. All parties must attend, and must also comply with all instructions set forth in the court's December 14, 2015 scheduling order 37 .(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
GAIL BENNETT-WOFFORD, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-02445-SI (DMR)
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS'
REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. No. 42
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On December 11, 2015, the Honorable Susan Illston referred this case for an emergency
13
settlement conference. On December 14, 2015, the undersigned issued an order scheduling a
14
January 26, 2016 settlement conference, and giving the parties a December 21, 2015 deadline to
15
notify the court of any scheduling conflicts. On January 15, 2016, Plaintiffs filed an untimely
16
request to reschedule. Docket No. 42. Defendant objected, noting among other things that its
17
corporate counsel had already paid for cross-country airfare and hotel accommodations associated
18
with the settlement conference. Docket No. 43.
19
The court denies Plaintiffs’ request due to its lateness, as well as the fact that rescheduling
20
would result in financial prejudice to Defendant. The settlement conference will go forward on
21
January 26, 2016 as originally scheduled. All parties must attend, and must also comply with all
22
instructions set forth in the court's December 14, 2015 scheduling order. Docket No. 37.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 19, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?