Barraza v. Cricket Wireless, LLC et al
ORDER RE EXTENSION by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 104 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2015)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
FLOR BARRAZA and NIKOLE
HENSON, individuals, on behalf of
themselves and others similarly situated,
No. C 15-02471 WHA
CRICKET WIRELESS LLC and LEAP
WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
ORDER RE EXTENSION
The parties have filed a stipulation requesting the Court to vacate its order setting forth
the procedure for resolving any disputes regarding attorney’s fees (Dkt. No. 104). That order
also required the parties to file the Rule 68 offer and acceptance today. The parties represent
that they have reached an agreement as to attorney’s fees, and expect to file a stipulated request
for dismissal by DECEMBER 23, 2015. They also represent that if they are required to file the
Rule 68 offer and notice of acceptance now, efforts to finalize their agreement would be
frustrated. The parties’ request to vacate the deadlines regarding attorney’s fees is DENIED.
The parties shall have until DECEMBER 28, 2015 to file the Rule 68 offer and acceptance. To be
clear, all other deadlines remain in place.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 18, 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?