Barraza v. Cricket Wireless, LLC et al

Filing 105

ORDER RE EXTENSION by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 104 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 FLOR BARRAZA and NIKOLE HENSON, individuals, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 No. C 15-02471 WHA v. CRICKET WIRELESS LLC and LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC., ORDER RE EXTENSION Defendants. 16 / 17 The parties have filed a stipulation requesting the Court to vacate its order setting forth 18 19 the procedure for resolving any disputes regarding attorney’s fees (Dkt. No. 104). That order 20 also required the parties to file the Rule 68 offer and acceptance today. The parties represent 21 that they have reached an agreement as to attorney’s fees, and expect to file a stipulated request 22 for dismissal by DECEMBER 23, 2015. They also represent that if they are required to file the 23 Rule 68 offer and notice of acceptance now, efforts to finalize their agreement would be 24 frustrated. The parties’ request to vacate the deadlines regarding attorney’s fees is DENIED. 25 The parties shall have until DECEMBER 28, 2015 to file the Rule 68 offer and acceptance. To be 26 clear, all other deadlines remain in place. IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: December 18, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?