Barraza v. Cricket Wireless, LLC et al

Filing 42

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION by Hon. William Alsup denying 41 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 FLOR BARRAZA and NIKOLE HENSON, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 No. C 15-02471 WHA v. 15 CRICKET WIRELESS, LLC, and LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 16 ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Defendants. / 17 The parties have filed a stipulation seeking to stay discovery, continue the case 18 19 management conference, extend the deadlines for opposition and reply briefs relating to the 20 pending motion to compel arbitration by over five weeks, and continue the hearing date for same 21 by three weeks. The parties offered no justification for such a massive extension. The parties’ 22 stipulated request is hereby DENIED. This denial is without prejudice to a request for a 23 reasonable extension supported by good cause. All deadlines and hearing dates remain in place. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 27, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?