Barraza v. Cricket Wireless, LLC et al
Filing
45
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF DEFENDANTS MOTIONTO COMPEL ARBITRATION by Hon. William Alsup denying 40 Motion to Stay.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2015)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
FLOR BARRAZA and NIKOLE
HENSON, individuals, on behalf of
themselves and others similarly situated,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. C 15-02471 WHA
v.
15
CRICKET WIRELESS, LLC, and LEAP
WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
16
ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO STAY DISCOVERY
PENDING RESOLUTION
OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
Defendants.
/
17
18
Defendants’ motion to stay discovery and other pre-trial matters pending resolution of
19
their motion to compel arbitration is DENIED. Even if the Court ultimately compels arbitration,
20
the initial disclosures and early discovery will still be useful in the arbitration proceedings.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 31, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
