City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System v. Revance Therapeutics, Inc. et al

Filing 12

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 11 Stipulation re 8 MOTION to Remand Extending Time to Oppose Motion to Remand. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2015)

1
2
3
4

COOLEY LLP
JOHN C. DWYER (136533) ([e-mail])
SHANNON M. EAGAN (212830) ([e-mail])
ADAM C. TRIGG (261498) ([e-mail])
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC., L DANIEL BROWNE,
LAUREN P. SILVERNAIL, JACOB WAUGH, ROBERT
BYRNES, RONALD EASTMAN, PHYLLIS GARDNER,
JAMES GLASHEEN, JONATHAN TUNNICLIFFE, and
RONALD WOOTEN

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15

CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE
RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and
on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

18
19
20
21
22
23

CLASS ACTION

Plaintiff,

16
17

Case No. 3:15-cv-02512-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND

v.
Date:
Time:
Judge:

REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC., L.
DANIEL BROWNE, LAUREN P.
SILVERNAIL, JACOB WAUGH, ROBERT
BYRNES, RONALD W. EASTMAN,
PHYLLIS GARDNER, JAMES GLASHEEN,
JONATHAN TUNNICLIFFE, RONALD
WOOTEN, COWEN AND COMPANY,
LLC, PIPER JAFFRAY & CO., BMO
CAPITAL MARKETS CORP., WILLIAM
BLAIR & COMPANY, LLC, AND DOES 125, inclusive,

August 6, 2015
2:00 PM
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.

Defendants.

24
25
26

Pursuant to United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Local

27

Rules (“L.R”) 6-2 and 7-12, Defendants Revance Therapeutics, Inc., L. Daniel Browne, Lauren P.

28

Silvernail, Jacob Waugh, Robert Byrnes, Ronald W. Eastman, Phyllis Gardner, James Glasheen,

COOLEY LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
P A LO A LTO

118082674 v1

1.

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME
TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND
3:15-CV-02512-HSG

1

Jonathan Tunnicliffe, Ronald Wooten, Cowen and Company LLC, Piper Jaffray & Co., BMO

2

Capital Markets, Corp., and William Blair & Company, LLC (“Defendants”) and Plaintiff City of

3

Warren Police and Fire Retirement System, (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, “the Parties”), hereby

4

agree and stipulate that good cause exists to request an order from this Court (i) extending

5

Defendants’ time to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to remand, and (ii) extending

6

Plaintiff’s time to file its reply to Defendants’ opposition to the motion to remand.

7

RECITALS

8

WHEREAS, on May 1, 2015, Plaintiff filed a putative class action, “City of Warren Police

9

and Fire Retirement System v. Revance Therapeutics, Inc. et. al.,” Case No. CIV 533635 against

10

Defendants in San Mateo Superior Court alleging violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the

11

“Complaint”);

12

WHEREAS, on June 5, 2015, Defendants removed the action to federal court (Dkt. 1);

13

WHEREAS, on June 5, 2015, the action was assigned to the Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.

14
15
16

(Dkt. 3);
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2015, this Court issued an Order setting an Initial Case
Management Conference for September 8, 2015, at 2:00 PM (Dkt. 4);

17

WHEREAS, on June 9, 2015, the parties stipulated under Civil L.R. 6-1(a) that, in light of

18

the anticipated remand motion and opposition, and in the interests of judicial economy and

19

preservation of the Court’s and the parties’ resources, Defendants need not respond to the pending

20

Complaint, but would respond within 30 days of Plaintiff amending the Complaint or designating

21

an operative complaint (Dkt. 7);

22
23

WHEREAS, on June 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand the action to state court,
indicating August 6, 2015 at 2:00 PM as the date and time for hearing on the motion. (Dkt. 8);

24

WHEREAS, Defendants intend to oppose the remand motion;

25

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3 Defendants’ opposition to the motion to remand

26

must be filed not more than 14 days after the motion to remand was filed, and Plaintiff’s reply

27

must be filed not more than 7 days after the opposition was due;

28
COOLEY LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
P A LO A LTO

118082674 v1

2.

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME
TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND
3:15-CV-02512-HSG

1

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties may file a stipulation, conforming to

2

Civil L.R. 7-12, requesting an order changing time that would affect the date of an event or

3

deadline already fixed by Court order, or that would accelerate or extend time frames set in the

4

Local Rules or in the Federal Rules;

5
6

WHEREAS, to accommodate scheduling conflicts and Counsel’s travel commitments,
Defendants require a brief extension of time to respond to the motion to remand.

7

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows:

8

1.

Defendants’ opposition to the motion to remand shall be filed on or before July 2,

2.

Plaintiff’s reply to the opposition to the motion to remand shall be filed on or

9
10
11

2015.

before July 14, 2015.

12

3.

The hearing on the remand motion will occur as currently scheduled on August 6,

13

2015, at 2:00 PM.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
P A LO A LTO

118082674 v1

3.

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME
TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND
3:15-CV-02512-HSG

1
Dated: June 16, 2015

COOLEY LLP

2
3
/s/ Shannon M. Eagan
Shannon M. Eagan (212830)

4
5

Attorneys for Defendants
REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC., L DANIEL
BROWNE, LAUREN P. SILVERNAIL, JACOB
WAUGH, ROBERT BYRNES, RONALD W.
EASTMAN, PHYLLIS GARDNER, JAMES
GLASHEEN, JONATHAN TUNNICLIFFE, and
RONALD WOOTEN

6
7
8
9

Dated: June 16, 2015

DECHERT LLP

10
11

/s/ Joshua D. N. Hess
Joshua D. N. Hess (244115)

12

DECHERT LLP
One Bush Street
Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.262.4583 direct
415.262.4555 fax
[e-mail]

13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendants
COWEN AND COMPANY, LLC, PIPER
JAFFRAY & CO., BMO CAPITAL MARKETS
CORP., WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, LLC

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
P A LO A LTO

118082674 v1

4.

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME
TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND
3:15-CV-02512-HSG

1

Dated: June 16, 2015

ROBBINS GELLAR RUDMAN & DOWD LLP

2
3

/s/ James I. Jaconette
James I. Jaconette (179565)

4

11

ROBBINS GELLAR RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
JAMES I. JACONETTE (179565)
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
619/231-7423 (fax)
– and –
SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113)
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
415/288-4534 (fax)

12

Attorneys for Plaintiff

5
6
7
8
9
10

13

*

14

*

*

ORDER

15
16
17
18

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

June 17, 2015
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
P A LO A LTO

118082674 v1

5.

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME
TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND
3:15-CV-02512-HSG

1
2

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
Pursuant to United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Civil L. R.

3

5-1(i), I, Shannon M. Eagan, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of the foregoing

4

document has been obtained from Joshua D. N. Hess and James I. Jaconette, who have provided

5

the conformed signatures above.

6

Dated: June 16, 2015

COOLEY LLP

7
8

/s/ Shannon M. Eagan
Shannon M. Eagan (212830)

9

Attorneys for Defendants
REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC., L DANIEL
BROWNE, LAUREN P. SILVERNAIL, JACOB
WAUGH, ROBERT BYRNES, RONALD
EASTMAN, PHYLLIS GARDNER, JAMES
GLASHEEN, JONATHAN TUNNICLIFFE, and
RONALD WOOTEN

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
P A LO A LTO

118082674 v1

6.

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME
TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND
3:15-CV-02512-HSG