Payton v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 9/21/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/28/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/15/2015. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JOHN L. BURRIS ESQ., SBN #69888 BEN NISENBAUM ESQ., SBN #222173 JAMES COOK ESQ., SBN #300212 THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 NATASHA PAYTON, an individual, CASE NO.: 4:15-cv-02528 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER vs. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a municipal corporation; Deputy ELDON EARNHARDT, individually and in his capacity as a deputy for the ALAMEDA COUNTY Sheriff’s Department; Deputy JASON DELIMA individually and in his capacity as a deputy for the ALAMEDA COUNTY Sheriff’s Department and DOES 1-25, inclusive, individually, jointly and severally, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 ORDER: Under the terms of the above stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the Case Management Conferences scheduled for September 21, 2015 24 be continued for the following action: 25 26 27 28 Natasha Payton v. County of Alameda et al Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate, San Francisco, CA, 94102. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ER R NIA n enderso on E. H H 9 helt Judge T RT 8 NO 7 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT FO 6 09/15/2015 UNIT ED 5 DATED: ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 4 S 3 LI 2 A 1 1:30 PM September 28 The new date for the Case Management Conferences is: _____________, 2015 at a.m./p.m. in N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?