Russian Hill Capital, LP v. Energy Corporation of America
Filing
35
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 34 Stipulation SETTING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Michael L. Charlson (SBN 122125)
mcharlson@velaw.com
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0923
Telephone: (415) 979-6900
Facsimile: (415) 651-8786
Steven S. Kaufhold (SBN 203625)
skaufhold@kaufholdgaskin.com
KAUFHOLD GASKIN LLP
388 Market Street, Suite 1300
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 445-4620
Facsimile: (415) 874-1071
Craig E. Zieminski (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
czieminski@velaw.com
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3700
Dallas, TX 75201-2975
Telephone:
(214) 220-7700
Facsimile:
(214) 220-7716
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RUSSIAN HILL CAPITAL, LP
Attorneys for Defendant
ENERGY CORPORATION OF AMERICA
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
RUSSIAN HILL CAPITAL, LP,
15
16
17
18
Case No. 3:15-cv-02554-HSG
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING
TIME FOR RESPONSE TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
vs.
ENERGY CORPORATION OF AMERICA
and DOES 1-10,
19
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Courtroom 15
Defendants.
20
21
The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows:
22
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Russian Hill Capital, LP filed and served its First Amended
23
Complaint for: (1) Fraud (2) Misrepresentation of Facts – Cal Corp Code § 25501 (3) Violation
24
of Section 14(e) of Exchange Act (the “First Amended Complaint”) on July 7, 2015;
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, Defendant Energy Corporation of America moved to dismiss the First
Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, Defendant Energy Corporation of America moved to dismiss the First
Amended Complaint;
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Setting Time for
Response to First Amended Complaint
1
Case No. 15-cv-02554 HSG
1
WHEREAS, by order entered March 15, 2016, the Court granted in part and denied in part
2
Defendant’s motion to dismiss, granting Plaintiff 30 days’ leave to amend the dismissed claim
3
under Section 14(e) – that is, until April 14, 2016;
4
5
6
7
WHEREAS, Defendant and Plaintiff have agreed to clarify the date for Defendant’s
response to the First Amended Complaint; and
WHEREAS, the requested schedule will not modify the schedule the Court set for a Case
Management Conference on April 19, 2016;
8
THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, the parties stipulate as follows:
9
1.
10
11
Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s remaining claims in the First Amended
Complaint shall be due on or before April 14, 2016.
2.
This Stipulation is without prejudice to further scheduling discussions and
12
suggestions to the Court that the parties may engage in should Plaintiff elect to amend the First
13
Amended Complaint.
14
15
Dated: March 28, 2016
Dated: March 28, 2016
16
KAUFHOLD GASKIN LLP
VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.
By: /s/ Steven S. Kaufhold
Steven S. Kaufhold
By: /s/ Michael L. Charlson
Michael L. Charlson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RUSSIAN HILL CAPITAL, LP
Attorneys for Defendant
ENERGY CORPORATION OF AMERICA
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER
23
24
Pursuant to the above stipulation, it is SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: March 29, 2016
_______________________________
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Setting Time for
Response to First Amended Complaint
2
Case No. 15-cv-02554 HSG
1
Civil L.R. 5-1(i)
2
I, Michael L. Charlson, hereby attest that Steven S. Kaufhold has concurred in the filing of
3
this document.
4
By: /s/ Michael L. Charlson
Michael L. Charlson
5
6
7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
8
9
The undersigned certifies that on March 28, 2016, the foregoing document was filed with
10
the Clerk of the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of California, using the court’s
11
electronic case filing system (ECF), in compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1. The ECF sends a Notice
12
of Electronic Filing (NEF) to all parties and counsel who have appeared in this action and who
13
have consented under Civil L.R. 5-1 to accept that NEF as service of this document.
14
Dated: March 28, 2016
VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.
15
By: /s/ Michael L. Charlson
Michael L. Charlson
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Setting Time for
Response to First Amended Complaint
3
Case No. 15-cv-02554 HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?