Fraizer v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al
Filing
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 8/24/2015. The hearing set for 8/19/2015 is vacated. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/14/2015. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
REGINA FRAIZER,
Case No. 15-cv-02559-JD
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
9
10
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On May 7, 2015, pro se plaintiff Regina Fraizer filed a complaint against defendants Wells
13
Fargo Bank, N.A., and Martha G. Bronitsky. Notice of Removal, Dkt. No. 1. The case was
14
removed to this Court on June 9, 2015. See id. On June 15, 2015, Wells Fargo filed a motion to
15
dismiss the complaint. See Mot. to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 10. Ms. Fraizer did not file a response to
16
Wells Fargo’s motion within the time period required by Civil Local Rule 7-3.
17
Ms. Fraizer is ordered to show cause why Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss should not be
18
granted. Ms. Fraizer’s response is due by August 24, 2015. If Ms. Fraizer no longer intends to
19
prosecute this case, she should file a notice of voluntary dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).
20
Failure to respond to Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss may result in the motion being granted, and
21
the action being dismissed for failure to prosecute.
22
23
24
25
The hearing on the motion to dismiss, which was set for August 19, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., is
vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 14, 2015
26
27
28
________________________
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?