People With Disabilities Foundation v. Colvin
Filing
16
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 15 Stipulation Continuing Deadline for Responsive Pleading and Initial Case Management Conference. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2015)
1 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
2
ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348)
3 Chief, Civil Division
4 ANN MARIE REDING (CABN 226864)
Assistant United States Attorney
5
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
6
Telephone: (415) 436-6813
FAX: (415) 436-6748
7
annie.reding@usdoj.gov
8
Attorneys for Defendant
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, INC.,
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of )
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02570-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING
DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
19
20
People with Disabilities, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner
21 of Social Security (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, make the following
22 representations and stipulate and agree as follows:
23
1.
On June 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action. See Dkt. No. 1.
24
2.
On June 29, 2015, the U.S. Attorney’s Office received a copy of Plaintiff’s Complaint by
25 certified mail. See Declaration of Ann Marie Reding (“Reding Decl.”), ¶ 2.
26
3.
On July 15, 2015, this case was set for an initial case management conference before
27 Judge Haywood S. Gilliam for September 29, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., with a case management conference
28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. 3:15-cv-02570-HSG
1 statement due to be filed on September 22, 2015. See Dkt. No. 14.
2
4.
On August 10, 2015, Defendant requested a 30-day extension of time to respond to
3 Plaintiff’s Complaint, to which Plaintiff agreed. Reding Decl. ¶ 3.
4
5.
In light of Defendant’s request, the parties stipulate and agree that Defendant’s response
5 to Plaintiff’s Complaint will be due on September 28, 2015. Id. at ¶ 4.
6
6.
The parties further request that the initial case management conference be continued from
7 September 29, 2015 to November 10, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. This continuance will allow enough time for a
8 hearing on Defendant’s motion to dismiss prior to the initial case management conference, should Defendant
9 decide to file a motion in response to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Id. at ¶ 5.
10
7.
No prior extensions of time have been requested or granted. See id. at ¶ 6.
11
8.
The only effect the requested time modification will have on this case is to delay the initial
12 case management conference for six weeks. Id.
13
14 DATED: August 10, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
15
17
____/s/ Steven F. Bruce______________
STEVEN F. BRUCE
Attorney for Plaintiff
People with Disabilities Foundation, Inc.
18 DATED: August 10, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
19
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
16
20
___/s/ Ann Marie Reding 1____________________
ANN MARIE REDING
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
I, Ann Marie Reding, hereby attest that I obtained the concurrence in the filing of this
document of all signatories whose signatures are represented by /s/.
28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. 3:15-cv-02570-HSG
ORDER
1
2
Plaintiff and Defendant’s Stipulation and Proposed Order Continuing Deadline for Defendant’s
3 Responsive Pleading and Initial Case Management Conference is hereby GRANTED. Defendant shall
4 file her responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint or before September 28, 2015. The initial case
5 management scheduled for September 29, 2015, has been continued to November 10, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
6
7
Date: August 12, 2015
_________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. 3:15-cv-02570-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?