People With Disabilities Foundation v. Colvin

Filing 41

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 39 Stipulation Continuing Hearing on Defendant's 34 Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 STEVEN BRUCE, SBN 70300 People With Disabilities Foundation 507 Polk Street, Suite 430 San Francisco, CA 94102 Phone:415) 931-3070 Fax: (415) 931-2828 steveb@pwdf.org 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, INC., Case No. 3:15-cv-02570-HSG 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiffs, 10 11 12 v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 13 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 18 counsel of record, that the date for oral argument on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 19 Second Amended Complaint be continued until Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 20 Plaintiff respectfully requests this extension of time due to an urgent medical situation 21 that requires Plaintiff’s counsel to be out of state on the original scheduled hearing date of 22 November 3, 2016. 23 24 DATED: October 26, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 25 26 27 28 /s/ Steven Bruce_________________ Steven Bruce Attorney for Plaintiff STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER RE HEARING DATE Case No. 3:15-cv-02570 HSG 1 2 DATED: October 26, 2016 Respectfully submitted, BRIAN J. STRETCH United States Attorney 3 4 ___/s/ Ann Marie Reding____________ ANN MARIE REDING Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 5 6 7 ORDER 8 9 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 10 11 12 Dated: October 28, 2016 __________________________________________ THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER RE HEARING DATE Case No. 3:15-cv-02570 HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?