People With Disabilities Foundation v. Colvin
Filing
41
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 39 Stipulation Continuing Hearing on Defendant's 34 Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2016)
1
2
3
STEVEN BRUCE, SBN 70300
People With Disabilities Foundation
507 Polk Street, Suite 430
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone:415) 931-3070
Fax: (415) 931-2828
steveb@pwdf.org
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, INC.,
Case No. 3:15-cv-02570-HSG
9
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiffs,
10
11
12
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
13
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective
18
counsel of record, that the date for oral argument on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
19
Second Amended Complaint be continued until Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
20
Plaintiff respectfully requests this extension of time due to an urgent medical situation
21
that requires Plaintiff’s counsel to be out of state on the original scheduled hearing date of
22
November 3, 2016.
23
24
DATED: October 26, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
25
26
27
28
/s/ Steven Bruce_________________
Steven Bruce
Attorney for Plaintiff
STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER RE HEARING DATE
Case No. 3:15-cv-02570 HSG
1
2
DATED: October 26, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN J. STRETCH
United States Attorney
3
4
___/s/ Ann Marie Reding____________
ANN MARIE REDING
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
5
6
7
ORDER
8
9
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
10
11
12
Dated: October 28, 2016
__________________________________________
THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER RE HEARING DATE
Case No. 3:15-cv-02570 HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?