North Star Gas Company v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company et al

Filing 21

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 18 Stipulation Regarding Response to Complaint and for Order Changing Time (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DENNIS S. ELLIS (SB# 178196)
[e-mail]
NICHOLAS J. BEGAKIS (SB# 253588)
[e-mail]
ADAM M. REICH (SB# 274235)
[e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
515 South Flower Street
Twenty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

ARNOLDO BARBA (SB#198131)
[e-mail]
LIM, RUGER & KIM, LLP
1055 West 7th Street, Suite 2800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendants
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; ALBERT
TORRES; BILL CHEN; and TANISHA ROBINSON

14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18

NORTH STAR GAS COMPANY d/b/a YEP
ENERGY, a Texas limited liability company,

19

Plaintiff,

20
21
22
23
24

vs.
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
COMPANY, a California corporation;
ALBERT TORRES, an individual; BILL
CHEN, an individual; TANISHA
ROBINSON, an individual,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02575-HSG
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION
REGARDING RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT AND FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME
Action Filed:
Current Response:
New Response:

June 9, 2015
September 8, 2015
September 15, 2015

[Stipulation Regarding Response to Complaint
and for Order Changing Time and Declaration
of Adam M. Reich filed concurrently herewith]

25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:15-CV-02575-HSG

ORDER RE: STIPULATION

1
2

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION
The Stipulation Regarding Response to Complaint and for Order Changing Time

3

(“Stipulation”), agreed to by Plaintiff North Star Gas Company d/b/a YEP Energy (“Plaintiff”)

4

and Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG&E”), Albert Torres, Bill Chen, and

5

Tanisha Robinson (collectively, “Defendants”), was submitted for Court approval on September

6

3, 2015. Having considered the Stipulation, and all other pleadings and papers on file in this

7

Action, the Court rules as follows:

8
9

Good cause appearing thereof, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

10
11

1. The date for Plaintiff to file an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s

12

Complaint that Defendants will file on September 15, 2015 is October 29, 2015;

13

2. The date for Defendants to file a Reply to the Opposition to Defendants’ Motion

14

to Dismiss, which Plaintiff will file on October 29, 2015, is November 12, 2015.

15

3. The hearing on the motion will be held on December 3, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.

16
17

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED this

10th day of September, 2015.

18
By:

19

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:15-CV-02575-HSG

-1-

ORDER RE: STIPULATION