North Star Gas Company v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company et al

Filing 75

ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' 60 MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 1/24/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NORTH STAR GAS COMPANY, Case No. 15-cv-02575-HSG Plaintiff, 8 ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS v. 9 10 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Re: Dkt. No. 60 12 13 The parties are directed to submit simultaneous supplemental briefs, not to exceed 15 14 pages, focusing on the legal basis for allowing (or prohibiting) a showing of anticompetitive 15 conduct under Section 2 in a regulated industry based on a “business torts” theory, however 16 named. The parties should discuss why the Court should or should not extend the application of 17 Section 2 to this case under the Ninth Circuit’s analysis in MetroNet Servs. Corp. v. Qwest Corp., 18 383 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2004), and why the Court should or should not make that determination as 19 a matter of law at the motion to dismiss stage. 20 In addition, the parties are directed to submit a list of Supreme Court and Circuit Court 21 cases that consider the application of Verizon to allegedly anticompetitive conduct in regulated 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 industries. The briefs must be submitted by February 6, 2017. No responsive filings are permitted. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1/24/2017 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?