Ramirez v. 101 Smith Ranch Road Strip Mall et al
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/3/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (S.B.N. 074414)
THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
1832-A Capitol Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
Telephone: (415) 444-5800
Facsimile:
(415) 674-9900
Email:
tfrankovich@disabilitieslaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
IRMA RAMIREZ
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
IRMA RAMIREZ,
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
15
16
17
18
19
20
101 SMITH RANCH ROAD STRIP
MALL, et al.,
Defendants.
) CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02578-LB
)
)
) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
) [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
21
22
23
24
25
26
The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this
action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2).
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their
designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and hereby is dismissed with
prejudice and each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over
2
enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994)
3
(empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement
4
agreements).
5
6
This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall
constitute one original document.
Respectfully Submitted,
7
8
Dated: March 2, 2016
THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, APLC
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
9
10
By: /s/ Thomas E. Frankovich
Thomas E. Frankovich
Attorney for Plaintiff
11
12
13
Dated: March 2, 2016
BRADLEY, CURLEY, ASIANO, BARRABEE,
ABEL & KOWALSKI, P.C.
14
By: /s/ Sara Allman
Sara Allman
Attorney for Defendants
15
16
17
ORDER
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to
Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2) and each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing
the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such enforcement be
necessary.
March 3
Dated: _____________, 2016
Hon. Laurel Beeler
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?