Zou et al v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Stipulated Protective Order Regarding Confidentiality filed by Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 29, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

Angela M. Alioto (SBN 130328)
[e-mail]
Matthew J. Wayne (SBN 283897)
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH L. ALIOTO AND
ANGELA ALIOTO
700 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7
8
9
10

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Kai Zou and Brookelyn Thibodeaux
JOHN F. BAUM (SBN 148366)
[e-mail]
AMY A. DURGAN (SBN 245325)
[e-mail]
JACOB R. SWISS (SBN 282738)
[e-mail]
HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP
505 Montgomery Street 13th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

Kai Zou and Brookelyn Thibodeaux,
Plaintiff,

20
21

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY

vs.

22

Case No. 3:15-cv-02587-JST

Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. and
DOES 1 to 20,

23
Defendant.
24
25

1.

PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

26

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of

27

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public

28

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.
1
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

4838-3027-1785

1

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated

2

Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on

3

all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure

4

and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment

5

under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section

6

12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential

7

information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and

8

the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material

9

under seal.
DEFINITIONS

2.1

Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

2.

11
H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

10

13

information or items under this Order.
2.2

“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is

14

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule

15

of Civil Procedure 26(c).

16
17
18
19
20

2.3

Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as

well as their support staff).
2.4

Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that

it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.5

Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the

21

medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,

22

testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or

23

responses to discovery in this matter.

24

2.6

Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to

25

the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a

26

consultant in this action.

27
28

2.7

House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House

Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
2
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

1
2
3

2.8

Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal

entity not named as a Party to this action.
2.9

Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this

4

action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action

5

on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party.

6
7
8
9
10

2.10

Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,

consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).
2.11

Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this action.
2.12

Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services

(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and

13

subcontractors.

14
15
16

2.13

Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as

“CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.14

Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a

17

Producing Party.

18

3.

19

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material

SCOPE

20

(as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2)

21

all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony,

22

conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

23

However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following

24

information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a

25

Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as

26

a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the

27

public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party

28

prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who
3
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

1

obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating

2

Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.

3

4.

4

Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by

5

this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court

6

order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all

7

claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after

8

the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action,

9

including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to

10

DURATION

applicable law.
5.

DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

5.1

Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party

13

or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care

14

to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.

15

The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents,

16

items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material,

17

documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept

18

unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

19

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are

20

shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to

21

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary

22

expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

23

If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated

24

for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other

25

Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

26
27

5.2

Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order

(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,

28
4
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

1

Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so

2

designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

3

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

4

(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but

5

excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing

6

Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains protected material. If only a

7

portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also

8

must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

9

margins).

10

A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection
need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all

13

of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the

14

inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party

15

must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order.

16

Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the

17

“CONFIDENTIAL” legend to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or

18

portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly

19

identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

20

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the

21

Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other

22

proceeding, all protected testimony.

23

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other

24

tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container

25

or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a

26

portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the

27

extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).

28

5.3

Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to
5

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

1

designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s

2

right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a

3

designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is

4

treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

5

6.

CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6

6.1

Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of

designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic

9

burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to

10

challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the

11

original designation is disclosed.

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality

8

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

7

6.2

Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution

13

process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis

14

for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written

15

notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this

16

specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in

17

good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other

18

forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In

19

conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality

20

designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the

21

designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered,

22

to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next

23

stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or

24

establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in

25

a timely manner.

26

6.3

Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court

27

intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under

28

Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) within 21 days
6
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

1

of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer

2

process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such motion must be

3

accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet

4

and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by the Designating Party to

5

make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 14 days, if applicable)

6

shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. In

7

addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation at any

8

time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition

9

transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be

and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet

11
H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

10

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating

13

Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose

14

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to

15

sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to

16

file a motion to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the

17

material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s

18

designation until the court rules on the challenge.

19

7.

ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

20

7.1

Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or

21

produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,

22

defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to

23

the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has

24

been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL

25

DISPOSITION).

26

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and

27

in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

28

\\\
7
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

1

7.2

Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered

2

by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any

3

information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees

4
5

of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information

6

for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that

7

is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

8
9
10

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving
Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and

13

Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

14

(d) the court and its personnel;

15

(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and

16

Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have

17

signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

18

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably

19

necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A),

20

unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed

21

deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately

22

bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this

23

Stipulated Protective Order.

24

(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or

25

other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

26

\\\

27

\\\

28

\\\
8
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

1
2

8.

PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN

OTHER LITIGATION

3

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels

4

disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party

5

must:

6
7

(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a
copy of the subpoena or court order;

8

(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the

9

other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this

10

Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the
Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.

13

If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the

14

subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as

15

“CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order

16

issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party

17

shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material –

18

and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving

19

Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

20
21

9.

A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED

IN THIS LITIGATION

22

(a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in this

23

action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in

24

connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order.

25

Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking

26

additional protections.

27

\\\

28

\\\
9
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

1

(b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a Non-

2

Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with

3

the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall:

4
5
6

(1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or all of
the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party;
(2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order in this

7

litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the

8

information requested; and

9
10

(3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.
(c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court within 14
days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely

13

seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession

14

or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a

15

determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the

16

burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

17

10.

UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

18

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

19

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective

20

Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the

21

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the

22

Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were

23

made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the

24

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

25
26
27
28

11.

INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE

PROTECTED MATERIAL
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently
produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the
10
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

1

Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This

2

provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery

3

order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of

4

Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a

5

communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product

6

protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order

7

submitted to the court.

8

12.

MISCELLANEOUS

9

12.1

Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to

10

seek its modification by the court in the future.
12.2

Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any

13

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no

14

Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered

15

by this Protective Order.

16

12.3

Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party

17

or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in

18

the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any

19

Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed

20

under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at

21

issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request

22

establishing that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or

23

otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected

24

Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) is denied by the court, then the

25

Receiving Party may file the information in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)

26

unless otherwise instructed by the court.

27

\\\

28

\\\
11
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

S

UNIT
ED

2

RT

5

7
8
9
10

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

11
H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

ER

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST

R NIA

. Ti ga r

H

6

nS
J u d ge J o

FO

NO

4

I
_____________________________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar

LI

September 29, 2015
DATED: ________________________

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

A

3

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

1

EXHIBIT A

2

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

3

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _________________

the Northern District of California on _________________ in the case of Kai Zou and Brookelyn

7

Thibodeaux v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc., Case No. 3:15-CV-02587-JST. I agree to

8

comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand

9

and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the

10

nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or

11

item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict

12
SAN FRA NCI S CO

understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for

6

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

[print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and

5

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

4

compliance with the provisions of this Order.

13

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the

14

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective

15

Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

16

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of

17

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone

18

number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any

19

proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.

20
21

Date: ______________________________________

22
23

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

24
25

Printed name: _______________________________

26
27

Signature: __________________________________

28
14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-02587-JST