Powerteq, LLC v. Moton
Filing
28
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS; DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO NOTICE MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES. Defendant i s ordered to immediately submit a chambers copy of his answer and his motion to dismiss or transfer. Defendant is ordered to file, no later than December 9, 2015, a notice of motion in which the motion to dismiss or transfer is set for hearing on a Friday at least 35 days after November 23, 2015. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 18, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
POWERTEQ, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,
No. C-15-2626 MMC
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
ASHRAF MOTON, an individual
Defendant.
/
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT’S
STANDING ORDERS; DIRECTING
DEFENDANT TO NOTICE MOTION TO
DISMISS OR TRANSFER IN
COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL
RULES
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On November 23, 2015, defendant Ashraf Moton electronically filed an answer to
plaintiff’s complaint and, in addition, a motion to dismiss or transfer the above-titled action.
Defendant has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s Standing
Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is
electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also
Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced documents. Defendant is hereby advised that if he fails in the future to comply
with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically filed
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
1
record any electronically filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely
2
provided to the Court.
3
Further, with respect to defendant’s motion to dismiss or transfer, filed November
4
23, 2015, defendant has violated an additional Civil Local Rule, specifically, the rule
5
requiring that “motions be . . . noticed in writing not less than 35 days after filing of the
6
motion.” See Civil L.R. 7-2(a). Defendant’s motion fails to include any hearing date, and,
7
although defendant caused a notation to be placed on the docket stating “Motion Hearing
8
set for 12/18/2015 09:00 AM” (see Document No. 23), said notation does not comply with
9
Rule 7-2(a), as December 18, 2015 is only twenty-five days from the date on which the
10
11
motion was filed.
Defendant is hereby ORDERED to file, no later than December 9, 2015, a notice of
12
motion in which the motion to dismiss or transfer is set for hearing on a Friday at least 35
13
days after November 23, 2015.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: December 2, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?