Osborne v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.

Filing 20

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 18 Stipulation to Continue the Case Management Conference.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Kenneth K. Lee, Esq. (SBN: 264296) klee@jenner.com Dean N. Panos (admitted pro hac vice) dpanos@jenner.com JENNER & BLOCK, LLP 633 West 5th St., Suite 3600 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2054 Tel. (213) 239-5152 Fax: (213) 239-5162 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Counsel for Defendant Kraft Foods Group, Inc. Benjamin M. Lopatin, Esq. (SBN: 281730) BLopatin@ELPLawyers.com EGGNATZ, LOPATIN & PASCUCCI, LLP 2201 Market Street, Suite H San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: (415) 324-8620 Facsimile: (415) 520-2262 Counsel for Plaintiff Yuri Osborne and the Proposed Class 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 17 YURI OSBORNE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 18 Plaintiff, 19 20 21 CLASS ACTION KRAFT FOODS GROUP, INC., a Virginia corporation, Defendant. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. 22 23 Case No.: 3:15-cv-2653-VC CMC date: September 22, 2015 Hearing Time: 10:00 am Courtroom: 4 Judge: Hon. Judge Vincent Chhabria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Yuri Osborne and Defendant, Kraft Foods Group, Inc. stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on August 12, 2015 Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 15); WHEREAS, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation altering the briefing schedule for the Motion to Dismiss and setting the hearing date for October 15, 2015 (Dkt. No. 17); WHEREAS, the Court previously set a Case Management Conference for September 22, 2015 (Dkt. No. 13); WHEREAS, the pending Motion to Dismiss may potentially alter the scope of the case, including discovery matters; 11 WHEREAS, the Parties believe that it would conserve judicial resources and streamline the 12 scheduling and discovery issues if the Case Management Conference were held after the Court 13 rules on the pending Motion to Dismiss; 14 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to the Court’s approval, that the 15 Case Management Conference be continued from September 22, 2015 to October 27, 2015, or any 16 other date after October 15, 2015 as determined by this Court. 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 18 19 Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 4, 2015 20 21 22 23 By: /s/ Kenneth K. Lee Kenneth K. Lee, Esq. (SBN: 264296) klee@jenner.com JENNER & BLOCK, LLP 633 West 5th St., Suite 3600 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2054 Tel. (213) 239-5152 Fax: (213) 239-5162 24 Counsel for Defendant, Kraft Foods Group, Inc. 25 -and- 26 27 Dated: September 4, 2015 By: /s/ Benjamin M. Lopatin Benjamin M. Lopatin, Esq. 28 {00271213 } 1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Case Management Conference Case No. 15-cv-2653-VC Cal. Bar No.: 281730 EGGNATZ, LOPATIN & PASCUCCI, LLP 2201 Market Street, Suite H San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: (415) 324-8620 Facsimile: (415) 520-2262 Email: BLopatin@ELPLawyers.com 1 2 3 4 5 Counsel for Plaintiff Yuri Osborne and the Proposed Class 6 7 ATTESTATION 8 I hereby attest that I have on file written authorization for any signatures indicated by a 9 10 “conformed” signature (/s/) in this e-filed document. /s/ Kenneth K. Lee Kenneth K. Lee 11 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 13 The undersigned certifies that on September 4, 2015, the foregoing was electronically filed 14 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send copies to all counsel of 15 record. 16 /s/ Kenneth K. Lee Kenneth K. Lee 17 18 19 20 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, it is so ordered. 21 22 23 Dated: __________________ 24 ___________________________ The Honorable Vincent Chhabria United States District Court Judge 25 26 27 28 {00271213 } 2 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Case Management Conference Case No. 15-cv-2653-VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?