Osborne v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.
Filing
20
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 18 Stipulation to Continue the Case Management Conference.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
Kenneth K. Lee, Esq. (SBN: 264296)
klee@jenner.com
Dean N. Panos (admitted pro hac vice)
dpanos@jenner.com
JENNER & BLOCK, LLP
633 West 5th St., Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2054
Tel. (213) 239-5152
Fax: (213) 239-5162
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Counsel for Defendant Kraft Foods Group, Inc.
Benjamin M. Lopatin, Esq. (SBN: 281730)
BLopatin@ELPLawyers.com
EGGNATZ, LOPATIN & PASCUCCI, LLP
2201 Market Street, Suite H
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 324-8620
Facsimile:
(415) 520-2262
Counsel for Plaintiff Yuri Osborne
and the Proposed Class
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
YURI OSBORNE, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
CLASS ACTION
KRAFT FOODS GROUP, INC., a Virginia
corporation,
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
22
23
Case No.: 3:15-cv-2653-VC
CMC date: September 22, 2015
Hearing Time: 10:00 am
Courtroom: 4
Judge: Hon. Judge Vincent Chhabria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Yuri Osborne and Defendant, Kraft Foods Group, Inc.
stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on August 12, 2015 Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint
(Dkt. No. 15);
WHEREAS, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation altering the briefing schedule for
the Motion to Dismiss and setting the hearing date for October 15, 2015 (Dkt. No. 17);
WHEREAS, the Court previously set a Case Management Conference for September 22,
2015 (Dkt. No. 13);
WHEREAS, the pending Motion to Dismiss may potentially alter the scope of the case,
including discovery matters;
11
WHEREAS, the Parties believe that it would conserve judicial resources and streamline the
12
scheduling and discovery issues if the Case Management Conference were held after the Court
13
rules on the pending Motion to Dismiss;
14
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to the Court’s approval, that the
15
Case Management Conference be continued from September 22, 2015 to October 27, 2015, or any
16
other date after October 15, 2015 as determined by this Court.
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
18
19
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: September 4, 2015
20
21
22
23
By: /s/ Kenneth K. Lee
Kenneth K. Lee, Esq. (SBN: 264296)
klee@jenner.com
JENNER & BLOCK, LLP
633 West 5th St., Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2054
Tel. (213) 239-5152
Fax: (213) 239-5162
24
Counsel for Defendant, Kraft Foods Group, Inc.
25
-and-
26
27
Dated: September 4, 2015
By: /s/ Benjamin M. Lopatin
Benjamin M. Lopatin, Esq.
28
{00271213 }
1
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Case Management Conference
Case No. 15-cv-2653-VC
Cal. Bar No.: 281730
EGGNATZ, LOPATIN & PASCUCCI, LLP
2201 Market Street, Suite H
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 324-8620
Facsimile: (415) 520-2262
Email: BLopatin@ELPLawyers.com
1
2
3
4
5
Counsel for Plaintiff Yuri Osborne
and the Proposed Class
6
7
ATTESTATION
8
I hereby attest that I have on file written authorization for any signatures indicated by a
9
10
“conformed” signature (/s/) in this e-filed document.
/s/ Kenneth K. Lee
Kenneth K. Lee
11
12
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
13
The undersigned certifies that on September 4, 2015, the foregoing was electronically filed
14
with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send copies to all counsel of
15
record.
16
/s/ Kenneth K. Lee
Kenneth K. Lee
17
18
19
20
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, it is so ordered.
21
22
23
Dated: __________________
24
___________________________
The Honorable Vincent Chhabria
United States District Court Judge
25
26
27
28
{00271213 }
2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Case Management Conference
Case No. 15-cv-2653-VC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?