Coyle v. Geissler et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION TO DISMISS; ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 22, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
David E. Lovejoy (CSB No. 055283)
11 Newport Landing Dr.
N OVATO , CA 94949-8210
T EL :
415-612-4047
F AX :
415-849-5409
e- MAIL : david.lovejoy@sbcglobal.net
Attorney for: Plaintiff Simon G. Coyle
Andrew S. Cantor
4132 3rd St #7
San Francisco, CA 94124
Telephone: (415) 817-1708
Fax: (415)400-4116
E-Mail: asc@cantor-law.com
Attorney for: Peter Geissler & Geissler & Associates
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
Simon G. Coyle
Plaintiff
13
v.
14
15
CASE NO: 3:15-cv-02691-MMC
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
[Proposed] ORDER
Peter S. Geissler and
Geissler & Associates
Defendants
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), by
18
and between plaintiff Simon G. Coyle and defendants Peter S. Geissler and Geissler & Associ-
19
ates through their attorneys of record, as follows:
20
21
1. The parties have reached a settlement of all claims asserted or that could have been asserted in this action and have entered into a SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
22
23
24
Stipulated Dismissal_2016-02-09-1.docx
Page 1 of 3
CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-02691-MMC
1
2. The parties, through their counsel, stipulate to dismiss this action with prejudice, with each
2
party to bear costs and attorneys’ fees as set forth in their SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
3
4
5
Dated: February 08, 2016
6
Signed:
/s/david lovejoy
7
David E. Lovejoy
8
Attorney for Plaintiff
9
Simon G. Coyle
10
11
12
13
14
Dated: February 08, 2016
15
Signed:
/s/andrew cantor
16
Andrew S. Cantor
17
Attorney for Defendants
18
Peter Geissler & Geissler & Associates
19
20
21
22
23
24
Stipulated Dismissal_2016-02-09-1.docx
Page 2 of 3
CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-02691-MMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
The parties having stipulated that the above-entitled action, and all claims for relief therein,
3
shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), with each party
4
bound by a SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT under which the Court retains jurisdiction over com-
5
pliance with the SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, DISMISSAL IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: Feb. 22, 2016
________
9
10
11
________________________________
12
By: Judge Maxine M. Chesney
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Stipulated Dismissal_2016-02-09-1.docx
Page 3 of 3
CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-02691-MMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?