Mays v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER RE FAILURE TO FILE STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. Parties shall meet and confer by 11/2/2015. Joint or Separate Statement due 11/16/2015. Defendant's Cross-Motion due 12/14/2015. Plaintiff's Reply due 12/28/2015. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/19/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 PHILLIP MAYS, Case No. 15-cv-02731-MEJ Plaintiff, 5 v. 6 7 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ORDER RE: FAILURE TO FILE STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Defendant. 8 On July 13, 2015, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer for the purpose of 9 determining whether they are able to file a joint statement of the Administrative Record or 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 whether it is necessary for the parties to file separate statements. 10. After the meet and confer, 12 the Court directed the parties to file either a joint statement or separate statements of the 13 Administrative Record, summarizing: (1) the procedural history of the case; (2) testimonial 14 evidence from the hearing(s) before the Administrative Law Judge; and (3) all relevant medical 15 evidence of record. Id. On October 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, but 16 no separate or joint statement of the record was filed. 17 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer by November 2, 2015 to 18 determine whether they will file a joint or separate statement of the record. The joint or separate 19 statement shall be filed by November 16, 2015. Defendant’s cross-motion (and separate statement 20 of the record, if no joint statement is filed) is due December 14, 2015. Plaintiff’s reply (and reply 21 statement of the record, if Defendant files a separate statement) is due December 28, 2015. 22 A. Joint Statement of the Administrative Record If the parties are able to agree on a joint statement of the Administrative Record, the 23 24 statement shall be signed by both parties and filed by the deadline above. Each fact must be set 25 forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative 26 Record where the fact finds support. 27 B. 28 Separate Statements of the Administrative Record If the parties are unable to agree on a joint statement, they shall comply with the following 1 requirements for separate statements of the Administrative Record. Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record 2 1. 3 By the deadline above, Plaintiff must file a statement, separate from the motion and 4 memorandum of law, setting forth each fact from the Administrative Record on which Plaintiff 5 relies in support of the motion. Each fact must be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph 6 and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where the fact finds support. A failure 7 to submit a separate statement in this form may constitute grounds for denial of the motion. Defendant’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record 8 2. 9 At the time Defendant files the cross-motion for summary judgment or for remand, Defendant must also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 forth: (a) for each paragraph of Plaintiff’s separate statement, a correspondingly numbered 12 paragraph indicating whether Defendant disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Plaintiff and, 13 if disputed, a reference to the specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting 14 Defendant’s position; and (b) any additional facts from the Administrative Record on which 15 Defendant relies in support of the motion. Each additional fact must be set forth in a separately 16 numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where the fact 17 finds support. 18 3. Reply Statement of Facts 19 If Defendant sets forth additional facts in the cross-motion, Plaintiff shall file a statement, 20 separate from the reply brief, with correspondingly numbered paragraphs indicating whether 21 Plaintiff disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Defendant and, if disputed, a reference to the 22 specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting Plaintiff’s position. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 Dated: October 19, 2015 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?