K.H. v. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
Filing
47
ORDER VACATING HEARING re 43 MOTION to Certify Class Notice of Motion and Motion to Approve Notice of Collective Action and To Conditionally Certify Class filed by Jeffrey Boyer, Brian Pierog, W. L., Donna Baxter, C. V., Richard DeVivo, Karnel McMahan, Kristen Pavkovich, Gary McConaghy, K.H., J. M. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 27, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
K.H., et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-02740-JST
Plaintiffs,
5
ORDER VACATING HEARING
v.
6
7
8
9
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY,
Re: ECF No. 43
Defendant.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Approve Notice of Collective Action and to
Conditionally Certify Class. ECF No. 43. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument.
12
The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for June 9, 2016, is hereby VACATED.
13
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
14
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
15
been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
16
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
17
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
18
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
19
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 27, 2016
_____________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?