Tangle, Inc. v. Magic Time International Ltd. et al
Filing
43
ORDER granting 42 STIPULATION to continue CMC and hearing date as to 30 MOTION to Dismiss. Case Management Statement due by 1/19/2016. Case Management Conference set and Motion Hearing set for 1/26/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/1/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2015)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
Tangle Inc.,
Plaintiff,
v.
6
7
8
9
Magic Time International Ltd.; and
Brown Sales & Marketing LLC
Case No.: 3:15-cv-2802-WHO
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DECEMBER 8, 2015 CMC AND
HEARING DATES
Defendants.
The parties have filed a Stipulation to Continue the December 8, 2015 CMC
10
11
and Hearing Dates to January 26, 2016, to permit the parties to engage in ADR
12
before the hearing on the Defendants’ motion to dismiss. [Doc 42] This is the
13
parties’ second request for an extension.
14
15
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and for good cause,
16
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
17
1. To accommodate the parties’ desire to explore settlement of the case, the
18
19
CMC shall be continued from December 8, 2015, at 2 p.m. to January 26,
20
2016, at 2 p.m. The parties Joint Case Management Statement is due
21
January 19, 2016; and
22
23
24
25
2. The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be continued from
December 8, 2015, at 4 p.m. to January 26, 2016, at 2 p.m.; and
3. No other deadlines are affected by this Order, and no further extensions
26
27
28
ORDER RE STIP.
Page 1 of 2
1
2
are contemplated.
SO ORDERED THIS 1st DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015.
3
_________________________
Hon. William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER RE STIP.
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?