Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Hudson Specialty Insurance Company

Filing 50

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 48 Stipulation to Allow Hudson Specialty Insurance Company to Amend Responses to Requests for Admission. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2016)

1 STEPHEN M. HAYES (SBN 83583)
[e-mail]
2 STEPHEN P. ELLINGSON (SBN 136505)
[e-mail]
3 JONATHAN K. MYERS (SBN 306756)
[e-mail]
4 HAYES SCOTT BONINO ELLINGSON & McLAY, LLP
203 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 480
5 Redwood City, California 94065
Telephone: [phone]
6 Facsimile: 650.637.8071
7 Attorneys for Defendant
HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
8
JAMES R. TENERO (SBN 201023)
9 [e-mail]
I O WENDY M. SCHENK (SBN 177397)
[e-mail]
11 SELMAN BREITMAN LLP
33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor
12 San Francisco, California 94105-4537
Telephone: [phone]
13
Facsimile: 415.979.2099
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
15 Scottsdale Insurance Company
16
UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, a
corporation
21
Plaintiff,
22

v.

23

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02896-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO ALLOW HUDSON
SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
TO AMEND RESPONSES TO
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE
24 COMPANY, a corporation
25~------------~D~e~fu~n~d~an~t~·--------__J

26
27
28
741921
STIPULATION & (PROPOSED) ORDER TO ALLOW HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY TO
AMEND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION- CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02896-HSG

1 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
2

Having met and conferred with respect to the matters set forth herein, plaintiff Scottsdale

3 Insurance Company ("Scottsdale") and defendant Hudson Specialty Insurance Company ("Hudson"),

4 referred to collectively as the "Parties," by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and

5 agree as follows:
I.
RECITALS

6
7

1.

WHEREAS, Scottsdale propounded requests for admission to Hudson and Hudson

8 served responses.

9

2.

WHEREAS, Hudson recently became aware of the need to revise responses to

10 Scottsdale's requests for admission, request nos. 3 and 5.
11

3.

WHEREAS, the parties hereby agree and stipulate to a Court order to allow Hudson

12 to revise its responses to Scottsdale's requests for admission, request nos. 3 and 5.
13

II.

STIPULATION

14

15

Scottsdale and Hudson hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

16
17
18

1.

The Parties agree to a Court order to allow Hudson to revise its responses to

Scottsdale's requests for admission, request nos. 3 and 5.

19

20
21
22
23

Dated: December 5, 2016

SELMAN BREITMAN LLP

By

l)f &k~

JAMES R. TENER
WENDY M. SCHENK
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY

24
25
26
27
28
741921
-1STIPULATION & jPROPOSED) ORDER TO ALLOW HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY TO
AMEND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION- CASE NO.3: 15-cv-02896-HSG

Dated: December 5, 2016

HA

fi1.S

TT BONINO ELLINGSON & McLAY, LLP

/1
_.---··
~ G/

2

By .
. STEPHEN M. HAYES
STEPHEN P. ELLINGSON
JONATHAN K. MYERS
Attorneys for Defendant
HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

3
4

5
6
7

8

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court hereby orders as follows:

9
1.

10

II
12

Hudson is allowed to serve revised responses to Scottsdale's requests for admission,

request nos. 3 and 5.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14 Dated:

December 6 , 2016

15
16
17

By__~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
741921
-2STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY TO
AMEND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION- CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02896-HSG