24/7 Customer, Inc. v. LivePerson, Inc.
Filing
159
STIPULATION AND ORDER re (158 in 3:15-cv-02897-JST) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Dismiss '719 and '715 Patents With Prejudice filed by 24/7 Customer, Inc., 24/7 Customer International Holdings, Ltd. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 18, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2017)
1 Mark E. Miller (State Bar No. 130200)
markmiller@omm.com
2 Geoffrey H. Yost (State Bar No. 159687)
3 gyost@omm.com
Alexander B. Parker (State Bar No. 264705)
4 aparker@omm.com
Bill Trac (State Bar No. 281437)
5 btrac@omm.com
Jay Choi (State Bar No. 302324)
6 jchoi@omm.com
7 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP th
Two Embarcadero Center, 28 Floor
8 San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Telephone: (415) 984-8700
9 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701
10 Susan D. Roeder (State Bar No. 160897)
11 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
2765 Sand Hill Road
12 Menlo Park, CA 94025-7019
13 Carolyn S. Wall (pro hac vice)
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
14
Times Square Tower, 7 Times Square
15 New York, NY 10036
16 Attorneys for Plaintiff
24/7 CUSTOMER, INC. and 24/7 CUSTOMER
17 INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD.
Adam R. Alper (State Bar No. 196834)
aalper@kirkland.com
Robert Nai-Shu Kang (State Bar No. 274389)
robert.kang@kirkland.com
James W. Beard (State Bar No. 267242)
james.beard@kirkland.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-436-1500
Joshua L. Simmons (pro hac vice)
joshua.simmons@kirkkland.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP
601 Lexington Ave.
New York, NY 10169
Telephone: 212-446-4800
Michael W. De Vries (State Bar No. 211001)
michael.devries@kirkland.com
Sharre S. Lotfollahi (State Bar No. 258913)
sharre.lotfollahi@kirkland.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP
333 South Hope Street, 29th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: 213-680-8590
Attorneys for Defendant
LIVEPERSON, INC.
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
21
22
23
24/7 Customer, Inc. and 24/7 Customer
International Holdings, Ltd.,
24
Plaintiffs,
25
26
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ’719 AND
’715 PATENTS WITH PREJUDICE
v.
LivePerson, Inc.,
27
Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-02897-JST (KAW)
(Lead Case)
Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-05585-JST (KAW)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendant.
28
STIP. TO DISMISS ’719 AND ’715
PATENTS WITH PREJUDICE
3:15-CV-02897-JST (KAW)
3:15-CV-05585-JST (KAW)
1
Plaintiffs [24]7 Customer, Inc. and 24/7 Customer International Holdings, Ltd.
2
(collectively, “[24]7”) and Defendant LivePerson, Inc. hereby stipulate to dismissal with
3
prejudice of Counts VI and VII (infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,975,719 and 7,245,715) of
4
the Complaint in Case No. 3:15-CV-05585-JST pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12.
5
6
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: August 17, 2017
9
/s/ Mark E. Miller
10
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
[24]7 CUSTOMER, INC. and 24/7 CUSTOMER
INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD.
11
12
13
MARK E. MILLER
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Dated: August 17, 2017
MICHAEL W. DE VRIES
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
14
/s/ Michael W. De Vries
15
Attorneys for Defendant
LIVEPERSON, INC.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO DISMISS ’719 AND ’715
PATENTS WITH PREJUDICE
-1-
3:15-CV-02897-JST (KAW)
3:15-CV-05585-JST (KAW)
1
2
3
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from Michael De Vries.
4
5
/s/ Mark E. Miller
Mark Miller (S.B. No. 130200)
markmiller@omm.com
6
7
Attorney for Plaintiffs
[24]7 Customer, Inc. and 24/7 Customer
International Holdings, Ltd.
8
9
10
11
12
[PROPOSED] ORDER
13
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Counts VI and VII of the
14
Complaint in Case No. 3:15-CV-05585-JST are dismissed with prejudice.
15
16
17
August 18, 2017
Dated: _____________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO DISMISS ’719 AND ’715
PATENTS WITH PREJUDICE
-2-
3:15-CV-02897-JST (KAW)
3:15-CV-05585-JST (KAW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?