Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, subscribing to Certificate No. 456344 v. Robinson et al

Filing 28

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/7/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/24/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE NO. 456344, Plaintiff, 9 v. Case No. 15-cv-02946-RS CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 10 11 COLBY ROBINSON, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case 14 Management Conference on September 24, 2015. After considering the Joint Case Management 15 Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and 16 good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 17 18 1. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. MEDIATION: The parties are hereby REFERRED to the court’s ADR department for the 19 20 purpose of engaging in mediation to take place, ideally, within the next 90 days. 21 2. 22 A Further Case Management Conference shall be held on January 7, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. 23 in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 24 California. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the 25 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Conference. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 2 3 Dated: September 24, 2015 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 15-cv-02946-RS 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?