Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, subscribing to Certificate No. 456344 v. Robinson et al
Filing
28
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/7/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/24/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO
CERTIFICATE NO. 456344,
Plaintiff,
9
v.
Case No. 15-cv-02946-RS
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING
ORDER
10
11
COLBY ROBINSON, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case
14
Management Conference on September 24, 2015. After considering the Joint Case Management
15
Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and
16
good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
17
18
1.
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION.
MEDIATION: The parties are hereby REFERRED to the court’s ADR department for the
19
20
purpose of engaging in mediation to take place, ideally, within the next 90 days.
21
2.
22
A Further Case Management Conference shall be held on January 7, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
23
in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
24
California. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the
25
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
Conference.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
2
3
Dated: September 24, 2015
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 15-cv-02946-RS
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?